COMPARISON OF LABETALOL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION USING 24-HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING

The safety and efficacy of labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were compared in a group of 34 patients aged 65 years or older with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 4‐week placebo run‐in period, during which all previous antihypertensive medication was discontinued, patients were randomized to receive either labetalol (100 mg bid) or HCTZ (25 mg bid). The patients' blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated biweekly and drug dosage was titrated (up to 400 mg and 50 mg bid of labetalol and HCTZ, respectively) to achieve a standing diastolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg. Patients underwent 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at the end of the placebo run‐in period and again after the 6‐week titration period. Both labetalol and HCTZ significantly (P < .01) reduced standing systolic (−19.4 vs −27.7 mm Hg) and diastolic (−14.0 vs −15.2 mm Hg) blood pressures following 12 weeks of treatment. Both antihypertensives effectively controlled the 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure, however, the labetalol group experienced a significantly lower rate of rise in diastolic blood pressure (P = .02) and mean arterial pressure (P = .02) during the acceleration period (400–1200) compared to the HCTZ group. HCTZ caused significant decreases in serum potassium (P < .01) and alkaline phosphatase (P < .05) and increases in uric acid (P < .01) and urea nitrogen (P = .07). These results indicate that labetalol may offer some unique advantages over thiazide diuretics that may be particularly important in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension. 1990 American College of Clinical Pharmacology