RESOURCE AVAILABILITY AT 3 PRESUMED STAGES OF A HEATHLAND SUCCESSION ON THE LUNEBURGER-HEIDE, GERMANY

被引:11
作者
LEUSCHNER, C
机构
[1] Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, D-3400
关键词
BETULA-PENDULA; BROAD-LEAVED FOREST; FAGUS-SYLVATICA; HEATHLAND; NUTRIENT; PAR TRANSMISSION; PINUS-SYLVESTRIS; QUERCUS-PETRAEA; SECONDARY SUCCESSION; SOIL-WATER POTENTIAL;
D O I
10.2307/3236112
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The availability of major plant resources was investigated in three vegetation types that were assumed to represent different stages of a secondary succession on heathland on the Luneburger Heide, northwestern Germany. Canopy transmission and absorption of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), soil-water availability, and nutrient (Ca, K, Mg, N, P) availability were monitored with high spatial and temporal resolution in (1) a Calluna vulgaris heathland, (2) a pioneer birch-pine forest and (3) a late-successional oak-beech forest, situated close to each other on comparable geological substrate (diluvial). Mean fractional transmission of PAR during summer decreased from 0.48 in the heathland to 0.04 in the oak-beech forest while the fractional canopy absorption increased from 0.49 to 0.92. Soil-water availability as indicated by the soil-water potential, was significantly influenced by differential canopy interception loss and characteristic rooting patterns in the three vegetation types. Annual mean nutrient concentrations in the equilibrium soil solution were similar or, for some elements, increased from the heathland to the birch-pine and the oak-beech forest despite a growing demand. A marked increase was found for the total nutrient pools in the soil-organic layer between early and late successional vegetation types. On the poor glacial parent material, nutrient pools seem to be strongly dependent on stand productivity and litter production which increased with succession. Thus, for nutrients, facilitation seems to be important in this type of succession.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 262
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bazzaz F.A., The physiological ecology of plant succession, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, pp. 351-371, (1979)
[2]  
Bazzaz F.A., Sipe T.W., Physiological ecology, disturbance, and ecosystem recovery, Potentials and limitations of ecosystem analysis, pp. 203-227, (1987)
[3]  
Billings W.D., The structure and development of old field shortleaf pine stands and certain associated physical properties of the soil, Ecological Monographs, 8, pp. 437-499, (1938)
[4]  
Boring L.R., Swank W.T., Monk C.D., Dynamics of early successional forest structure and processes in the Coweeta basin, Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta, pp. 161-179, (1988)
[5]  
Bormann F.H., Likens G.E., Siccama T.G., Pierce R.S., Eaton J.S., The export of nutrients and recovery of stable conditions following deforestation at Hubbard Brook, Ecological Monographs, pp. 255-277, (1974)
[6]  
Christensen N.L., Peet R.K., Secondary forest succession on the North Carolina Piedmont, Forest succession. Concepts and application, pp. 230-245, (1981)
[7]  
Diemont W.H., Mennega A.A., Changes in virgin sandy soils caused by Pinus sylvestris, Forest dynamics research in Western and Central Europe, pp. 69-76, (1986)
[8]  
Goldberg D.E., Components of resource competition in plant communities, Perspectives on Plant Competition, pp. 27-49, (1990)
[9]  
Gorham E., Vitousek P.M., Reiners W.A., The regulation of chemical budgets over the course of terrestrial ecosystem succession, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, pp. 53-84, (1979)
[10]  
Gurnell A.M., Gregory K.J., Vegetation characteristics and the prediction of runoff: analysis of an experiment in the New Forest, Hampshire, Hydrol. Proc., 1, pp. 125-142, (1987)