CROPPING AND SULFUR FERTILIZATION INFLUENCE ON SULFUR TRANSFORMATIONS IN SOIL

被引:57
作者
CASTELLANO, SD [1 ]
DICK, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] OREGON STATE UNIV,DEPT SOIL SCI,202 STRAND AGR HALL,CORVALLIS,OR 97331
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010020x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The dynamics of S cycling in soils are not well understood. A 2-yr field study was conducted to determine the effects of two S fertilizers (CaSO4.2H2O[CS] or elemental S [ES]) at two fertilization rates (0 or 50 kg S ha-1 yr-1) on the temporal distribution of soil S fractions (inorganic SO4, ester sulfate, and C-bonded and residual S), arylsulfatase activity, and microbial-biomass C and S in soil. The soil studied (a fine-silty, mixed mesic Aquultic Argixeroll) was cropped with winter rape, Brassica napus L. var. napus or left uncropped. Sulfate levels (0-15 cm depth) were significantly (P < 0.01) affected by S-fertilizer treatment. During the rainy winter season, SO4 levels ranged from 7 to 13 mg kg-1 in CS plots, compared with 2 to 7 mg kg-1 in control plots. In the months from March to May, biomass S increased and SO4 levels decreased (< 6 mg SO4-S kg-1 soil), indicating S immobilization was occurring in the spring. Ester sulfate and residual S varied seasonally, whereas C-bonded S showed minimal seasonal fluctuations. Cropping significantly increased biological activity (arylsulfatase activities and biomass C) over uncropped treatments. Subsoil SO4 appeared to be both a source (upward movement during high evapotranspiration) and a sink for S in surface soil, with extractable SO4 in the 60- to 90-cm depth being significantly affected by cropping and S fertilization. The limitations of using extractable SO4 as a soil test were shown by wide variations in SO4 over time (2-14 mg SO4 kg-1 soil) in control plots, even though there was a seed yield response to S.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.032
[2]  
BARROW N. J., 1966, AUSTRALIAN J EXP AGR ANIM HUSB, V6, P9, DOI 10.1071/EA9660009
[3]   STEAM DISTILLATION METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF AMMONIUM NITRATE AND NITRITE [J].
BREMNER, JM ;
KEENEY, DR .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1965, 32 (05) :485-&
[4]   DISTRIBUTION OF SULFUR FRACTIONS IN SOIL AS INFLUENCED BY MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIC RESIDUES [J].
CASTELLANO, SD ;
DICK, RP .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (05) :1403-1407
[5]  
CASTELLANO SD, 1990, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V54, P283
[6]   ION CHROMATOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF SULFATE AND NITRATE IN SOILS [J].
DICK, WA ;
TABATABAI, MA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1979, 43 (05) :899-904
[7]  
Fitzgerald J. W., 1978, Sulfur in the Environment. Part II. Ecological Impacts, P391
[8]   SULFATE ESTER FORMATION AND HYDROLYSIS - POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT YET OFTEN IGNORED ASPECT OF SULFUR CYCLE OF AEROBIC SOILS [J].
FITZGERALD, JW .
BACTERIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1976, 40 (03) :698-721
[9]  
FITZGERALD JW, 1978, BACTERIOL REV, P391
[10]  
FRENEY J R, 1971, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, V3, P133, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(71)90006-X