MRI OF OROFACIAL TUMORS AND PARAGANGLIOMAS WITH 2D GE SEQUENCES - INDICATIONS AND OPTIMAL SEQUENCE PARAMETERS

被引:4
作者
HELD, P
机构
[1] Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, 8400 Regensburg
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); HEAD AND NECK; TECHNIQUE; NEOPLASMS; MR; PARAGANGLIOMA;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(94)90364-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to determine to what extent and in which cases 2D gradient echo (2D GE) sequences can be applied alternatively or additionally to spin echo (SE) sequences for improved diagnostic evaluation. Imaging with SE sequences is the most frequently used MR technique in the assessment of ear, nose and throat (ENT) tumors. In literature there are only a few reports on the contrast behaviour of 2D GE sequences using different sequence parameters and their application in ENT tumors. This paper set out to establish the most suitable sequence type and sequence parameters. Measurements were performed with a Magnetom SP 63 MR system (Siemens) with a field strength of 1.5 T, using head and Helmholtz coils. One-hundred twenty-eight volunteers and 369 patients were examined with 2D GE sequences. In order to find the best MR technique for the examination of orofacial tumors and paragangliomas, FLASH, FISP and PSIF sequences with different sequence parameters (TR, TE, flip angle, bandwidth) were applied. The results of these examinations confirmed the superiority of 2D GE sequences over SE sequences. In conclusion, contrast enhanced or unenhanced T1 weighted SE sequences should be replaced by 2D GE FLASH 70 degrees in the examination of orofacial tumors. In the case of paragangliomas of the jugular bulb and the parapharyngeal space T1- and T2-weighted SE sequences should be replaced by 2D GE FLASH 40 degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 44
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Chisin, MRI/CT and pathology in head and neck tumors, (1989)
[2]  
Obletter, Braitinger, Held, Kett, Prull, Gruss, Breit, Dynamische Darstellung von AV-Malformationen in der MRT, Der Nuklearmediziner, 13, pp. 197-206, (1990)
[3]  
Kett, Prull, Physical principles and signal behaviour in magnetic resonance imaging, Magnetic resonance in oncology, pp. 3-14, (1990)
[4]  
Frahm, Haase, Matthaei, Rapid three-dimensional MR imaging using the FLASH technique, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 10, pp. 363-368, (1986)
[5]  
Oppelt, Graumann, Barfuss, Fischer, Hartl, Schajor, FISP: Eine neue schnelle Pulssequenz für die Kernspintomographie, Electromedica, 54, pp. 15-18, (1986)
[6]  
Winkler, Ortendahl, Mills, Crooks, Sheldon, Kaufman, Kramer, Characteristics of partial flip angle and gradient reversal MR imaging, Radiology, 166, pp. 17-26, (1988)
[7]  
Owen, Wehrli, Predictability of SNR and reader preference in clinical MR Imaging, Magn Res Imaging, 8, pp. 737-745, (1990)
[8]  
Edelstein, Bottomley, Hart, Smith, Signal, noise, and contrast in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 7, pp. 391-401, (1983)
[9]  
Kaufman, Kramer, Crooks, Ortendahl, Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging, Radiology, 173, pp. 265-267, (1989)
[10]  
Wehrli, Shaw, Kneeland, Biomedical magnetic resonance imaging, (1988)