Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005

被引:78
作者
Allen, Keith [1 ]
Cheng, Davy [2 ]
Cohn, William [3 ]
Connolly, Mark [4 ]
Edgerton, James [5 ]
Falk, Volkmar [6 ]
Martin, Janet [2 ]
Ohtsuka, Toshiya [7 ]
Vitali, Richard [4 ]
机构
[1] Heart Ctr Indiana, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Med, London, ON, Canada
[3] Texas Heart Inst, Houston, TX 77025 USA
[4] St Michaels Hosp, Newark, NJ USA
[5] Cardiopulmonary Res Sci & Technol Inst, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Klin Herzchirurgie Herzzentrum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Tokyo Metropolitan Fuchu Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
endoscopic vascular harvest; coronary artery bypass grafting; consensus statement;
D O I
10.1097/01.gim.0000196315.32179.82
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This purpose of this consensus statement was to compare endoscopic vascular graft harvesting (EVH) with conventional open vascular harvesting (OVH) in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and to determine which resulted in improved clinical and resource outcomes. Methods: Before the consensus conference, the consensus panel reviewed the best available evidence, whereby systematic reviews, randomized trials, and nonrandomized trials were considered in descending order of importance. Evidence- based statements were created, and consensus processes were used to determine the ensuing statements. The AHA/ACC system was was used to label the level of evidence and class of recommendation. Results: The consensus panel agreed upon the following statements: EVH is recommended to reduce wound related complications when compared with OVH (Class I, Level A). Based on quality of conduit harvested, either endoscopic or open vein harvest technique may be used (Class IIa; Level B). Based on major adverse cardiac events and angiographic patency at 6 months, either endoscopic or open vein harvest technique may be used (Class IIa; Level A). EVH is recommended for vein harvesting to improve patient satisfaction and postoperative pain when compared with OVH in CABG surgery (Class I, Level A). EVH is recommended for vein harvesting to reduce postoperative length of stay and outpatient wound management resources (Class I, Level A). Conclusions: Given these evidence-based statements, the consensus panel stated that EVH should be the standard of care for patients who require saphenous vein grafts for coronary revascularization (Class I, Level B). Future research should address long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and endoarterial harvest.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Allen KB, 2003, HEART SURG FORUM, V6, pE143
[2]
Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: A prospective, randomized trial [J].
Allen, KB ;
Griffith, GL ;
Heimansohn, DA ;
Robison, RJ ;
Matheny, RG ;
Schier, JJ ;
Fitzgerald, EB ;
Shaar, CJ .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (01) :26-31
[3]
[Anonymous], 2004, CHEST, V1263, p174S
[4]
Are wound healing disturbances and length of hospital stay reduced with minimally invasive vein harvest? - A meta-analysis [J].
Athanasiou, T ;
Aziz, O ;
Al-Ruzzeh, S ;
Philippidis, P ;
Jones, C ;
Purkayastha, S ;
Casula, R ;
Glenville, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 26 (05) :1015-1026
[5]
Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting [J].
Athanasiou, T ;
Aziz, O ;
Skapinakis, P ;
Perunovic, B ;
Hart, J ;
Crossman, MC ;
Gorgoulis, V ;
Glenville, B ;
Casula, R .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (06) :2141-2146
[6]
Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: A comparison of postoperative wound complications [J].
Bitondo, JM ;
Daggett, WM ;
Torchiana, DF ;
Akins, CW ;
Hilgenberg, AD ;
Vlahakes, GJ ;
Madsen, JC ;
MacGillivray, TE ;
Agnihotri, AK .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (02) :523-528
[7]
Minimally invasive vein harvesting significantly reduces pain and wound morbidity [J].
Black, EA ;
Campbell, RNK ;
Channon, KM ;
Ratnatunga, C ;
Pillai, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 22 (03) :381-386
[8]
Endoscopic vein harvest: Advantages and limitations [J].
Bonde, P ;
Graham, ANJ ;
MacGowan, SW .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (06) :2076-2082
[9]
Brandt CP, 2003, HEART SURG FORUM, V6, P258
[10]
Cheng D, 2005, INNOVATIONS, pxx