The government's role in promoting corporate responsibility: a comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective

被引:31
作者
Albareda, Laura [1 ]
Tencati, Antonio [2 ]
Lozano, Josep M. [3 ]
Perrini, Francesco [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ramon Llull, Inst Individual Corporat & Soc, ESADE Business Sch, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dept Management IEGI, Management, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Ramon Llull, Dept Social Sci, ESADE Business Sch, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Bocconi Univ, Dept Management IEGI, Milan, Italy
来源
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY | 2006年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
Italy; United Kingdom; Corporate social responsibility; Public policy;
D O I
10.1108/14720700610689504
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the changing role of governments promoting corporate responsibility (CR) as a result of the challenges raised by globalisation. Design/methodology/approach - CR is linked to the restructuring of governments' agendas in the framework of government/private sector/civil society relationships. It is a result of the research project that applies the Relational State Model Approach to the analysis of CR public policies. The relational state situates the relations between the public and private sectors, between the state and society, in the sphere of co-responsibility. Findings - The paper concludes that in the UK a more systemic, national government-centred and business-oriented approach prevails, while Italy has a more extensive, multi-stakeholder and multi-level approach. Research limitations/implications - Future research should complete the comparative analysis expanding it to other European countries: northern and central European countries to analyse the difference between all European governments in order to promote CR. Practical implications - The analytical framework of this paper could be used for academic, business leaders and policy makers to develop future actions in relation to CR public development. Originality/value - The objective to be achieved is to understand the new political and public framework incorporating CR as a new form of governance. We compare two countries that represent two very different models of government action. The theoretical approach of the paper is based on the comparative analysis of CR governmental vision, objectives, strategies and internal government CR structure.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Aaronson S.A., 2002, EUROPEAN RESPONSE PU
[2]  
Aaronson S. A., 2002, CORPORATE RESPONSIBI
[3]  
Albareda L., 2006, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES, P112, DOI [10.1057/9780230599574_8, DOI 10.1057/9780230599574_8]
[4]  
Albareda L., 2004, INT CSR RES C NOTT
[5]  
Becattini G., 2004, CAPITALISMO VOLTO UM
[6]  
Bell D.V.J., 2005, ROLE GOVERN IN PRESS
[7]  
[CBSR] Canadian Business for Social Responsibility, 2001, GOV CORP SOC RESP OV
[8]  
Chatam House Sustainable Development Programme, 2004, FOLL WORLD SUMM SUS
[9]  
Commission, 2001, GREEN PAP PROM EUR F
[10]  
Crane A., 2019, BUSINESS ETHICS MANA