THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS

被引:215
作者
IWASA, Y [1 ]
POMIANKOWSKI, A [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON UNIV COLL, DEPT GENET & BIOMETRY, LONDON NW1 2HE, ENGLAND
关键词
HANDICAP PRINCIPLE; MATE CHOICE; RUNAWAY; SEXUAL CHARACTERS; SEXUAL SELECTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01367.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Males of many species use multiple sexual ornaments in their courtship display. We investigate the evolution of female sexual preferences for more than a single male trait by the handicap process. The handicap process assumes that ornaments are indicators of male quality, and a female benefits from mate choice by her offspring inheriting ''good genes'' that increase survival chances. A new handicap model is developed that allows equilibria to be given in terms of selection pressures, independent of genetic parameters. Multiple sexual preferences evolve if the overall cost of choice is not greatly increased by a female using additional male traits in her assessment of potential mates. However, only a single preference is evolutionarily stable if assessment of additional male traits greatly increases the overall cost of choice (more than expected by combining the cost of each preference independently). Any single preference can evolve, the outcome being determined by initial conditions. The evolution of one preference effectively blocks the evolution of others, even for traits that are better indicators of male quality. Comparison is made with sexual selection caused by Fisher's runaway process in which male traits are purely attractive characters. This shows that sexual preferences for multiple Fisher traits are likely to evolve alongside preference for a single handicap trait that indicates male quality. This is a general difference in the evolutionary outcome of these two causes of sexual selection.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 867
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ANDERSSON M, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P804, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00540.x
[2]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[3]  
BARTON NH, 1991, GENETICS, V127, P229
[4]  
Fisher RA., 1930, GENETICAL THEORY NAT, DOI 10.5962/bhl.title.27468
[5]   THE COSTS OF FEMALE CHOICE IN A LEKKING BIRD [J].
GIBSON, RM ;
BACHMAN, GC .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1992, 3 (04) :300-309
[6]   BIOLOGICAL SIGNALS AS HANDICAPS [J].
GRAFEN, A .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1990, 144 (04) :517-546
[7]  
Harvey P.H., 1991, P203
[8]   FEMALE CHOICE AND THE HERITABILITY OF ATTRACTIVE MALE TRAITS - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY [J].
HEDRICK, AV .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 132 (02) :267-276
[9]  
IWASA Y, 1991, EVOLUTION, V45, P1431, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02646.x
[10]   MODELS OF SPECIATION BY SEXUAL SELECTION ON POLYGENIC TRAITS [J].
LANDE, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 78 (06) :3721-3725