RIGOR IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH - THE ASSESSMENT OF TRUSTWORTHINESS

被引:1763
作者
KREFTING, L
机构
[1] School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
关键词
RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL SCIENCES;
D O I
10.5014/ajot.45.3.214
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Despite a growing interest in qualitative research in occupational therapy, little attention has been placed on establishing its rigor. This article presents one model that can be used for the assessment of trustworthiness or merit of qualitative inquiry. Guba's (1981) model describes four general criteria for evaluation of research and then defines each from both a quantitative and a qualitative perspective. Several strategies for the achievement of rigor in qualitative research useful for both researchers and consumers of research are described.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 222
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Aamodt A M, 1982, West J Nurs Res, V4, P209, DOI 10.1177/019394598200400207
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, SPEAKING ETHNOGRAPHY
[3]  
CAMPBELL DT, 1966, EXPT QUASI-EXPT DESI
[4]  
Crapanzano Vincent, 1980, TUHAMI PORTRAIT MORO
[5]   DESIGNING NURSING RESEARCH - THE QUALITATIVE-QUANTITATIVE DEBATE [J].
DUFFY, ME .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1985, 10 (03) :225-232
[6]  
FIELD PA, 1985, NURSING RES APPLICAT
[7]  
GOOD B., 1985, PHYSICIANS W MED, P193
[8]  
GUBA EG, 1981, ECTJ-EDUC COMMUN TEC, V29, P75
[9]   QUALITATIVE RESEARCH .1. PARADIGMATIC GROUNDS AND ISSUES OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY [J].
KIELHOFNER, G .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1982, 2 (02) :67-79
[10]  
Kirk Jerome, 1986, RELIABILITY VALIDITY, V1