PLAIN RADIOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION IN TRIMALLEOLAR ANKLE FRACTURES POORLY ASSESSES POSTERIOR FRAGMENT SIZE

被引:152
作者
FERRIES, JS [1 ]
DECOSTER, TA [1 ]
FIROOZBAKHSH, KK [1 ]
GARCIA, JF [1 ]
MILLER, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NEW MEXICO,SCH MED,DEPT ORTHOPAED & REHABIL,ALBUQUERQUE,NM 87131
关键词
ANKLE INJURIES; FRACTURE; DISTAL TIBIA; RADIOGRAPHY; RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/00005131-199408000-00009
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Twenty-five patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures were evaluated using both conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT) to determine the size of the posterior fragment along with other fracture characteristics. Plain radiograph measurements indicated very poor inter- and intraexaminer reliability. When compared to the CT scan measurement, 54% of the plain radiographic readings revealed >25% error. Plain radiographic interpretations erred in most cases by overrating the size of the fragment, but major underestimations also occurred. The larger size fragments showed more error than the smaller ones. This information confirms our clinical suspicion that the lateral radiograph is unreliable in assessing the posterior fragment size.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 331
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Cone R.O., Nguyen V., Fluornoy J., Guerra J., Triplane fracture of the distal tibial epiphysis: Radiographic and CT studies, Radiology, 153, pp. 763-767, (1984)
[2]
Feldman F., Singson R.D., Rosenberg Z.S., Berdon W.E., Amodio J., Abramson S.J., Distal tibial triplane fractures: Diagnosis with CT, Radiology, 1164, pp. 429-435, (1987)
[3]
Gill K., Krag M.H., Johnson G.B., Haugh L.D., Pope M.H., Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion, Spine, 13, pp. 50-53, (1988)
[4]
Harper M.C., Hardin G., Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle associated with external rotation-abduction injuries, J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 70, pp. 1348-1356, (1988)
[5]
Heim U.F.A., Trimalleolar fractures: Late results after fixation of the posterior fragment, Orthopedics, 8, pp. 1053-1060, (1989)
[6]
Horn B.D., Rettig M.E., Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures, J Orthop Trauma, 7, pp. 357-360, (1993)
[7]
Keeley J., Mayer T.G., Cox R., Gatchel R.J., Smith J., Mooney V., Quantification of lumbar function, Spine, 11, pp. 31-35, (1986)
[8]
Lauge-Hansen N., Fractures of the ankle II. Combined experimental-surgical and experimental-roentgenologic investigations, Arch Surg, 60, pp. 957-985, (1950)
[9]
Lindsjo U., Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations, Clin Orthop, 199, pp. 28-38, (1985)
[10]
Macko V.W., Matthews L.S., Zwirkoski P., Goldstein S.A., The joint-contact area of the ankle, J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 733, pp. 347-351, (1991)