CONTRASTING MINERALOGICAL-GEOCHEMICAL SIGNATURES OF MANGANESE OXIDES - GUIDES TO METALLOGENESIS

被引:172
作者
NICHOLSON, K
机构
来源
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AND THE BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGISTS | 1992年 / 87卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.2113/gsecongeo.87.5.1253
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Manganese oxides have a strong sorption capacity for cationic species in the depositional fluid. This sorption capacity is reflected in the chemistry of the oxides, which is different from that for the oxides precipitated from fresh water, seawater, and hydrothermal fluids. Characteristic mineralogical-geochemical enrichment and geochemical association (defined statistically) signatures, in conjunction with several diagnostic plots, can be employed to distinguish between the following different genetic types of manganese deposits: supergene hydrothermal; supergene marine terrestrial; supergene dubhite; and supergene marine hydrothermal sedimentary exhalative (sedex). "Dubhites" are manganese oxides derived from the weathering of a mineralized sequence (i.e., base and precious ore minerals and gangue). Hydrothermal deposits characteristically show geochemical enrichments in the assemblage As-Ba-Cu-Li-Mo-Pb-Sb-Sr-V-Zn and an Mn-As geochemical association. Supergene marine deposits show Na-K-Ca-Mg-Sr and Co-Cu-Ni geochemical enrichments, whereas supergene terrestrial deposits tend to have very high Ba contents and an Mn-Ba association. Dubhites contain high levels of Pb and Zn, show an Mn-Pb-base metal association, and are composed of significant quantities of base metal-bearing manganese oxides. Bixbyite, braunite, hausmannite, hubnerite, jacobsite, and pyrochroite occur predominantly only in hydrothermal deposits, whereas chalcophanite, coronadite, crednerite, delta-MnO2, groutite, hollandite, lithiophorite, manganite, nsutite, quenselite, ramsdellite, romanechite, todorokite, and woodruffite are generally of supergene origin. In addition to established plots presently used to identify marine sedimentary exhalative deposits, the following diagnostic graphs were devised: Na vs. Mg distinguishes deposits of marine and fresh water origin, Co + Ni vs. As + Cu + Mo + Pb + V + Zn discriminates between hydrothermal and supergene oxides, and Pb vs. Zn can be used to recognize dubhites and therefore prospective sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1264
页数:12
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]  
AJMAL M, 1990, MINER DEPOSITA, V25, P160
[2]   HYDROTHERMAL OXIDE AND NONTRONITE DEPOSITS ON SEAMOUNTS IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC [J].
ALT, JC .
MARINE GEOLOGY, 1988, 81 (1-4) :227-239
[3]  
ANDREW RL, 1984, MINER SCI ENG, V12, P193
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
ANTOPYZANTOP H, 1978, ECON GEOL, V73, P1137
[6]   GEOLOGY OF THE BAN-BAN ZINC DEPOSIT, A SULFIDE-BEARING SKARN, SOUTHEAST QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA [J].
ASHLEY, PM .
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, 1980, 75 (01) :15-29
[7]   ARSENIC GEOCHEMISTRY IN GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS [J].
BALLANTYNE, JM ;
MOORE, JN .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1988, 52 (02) :475-483
[8]  
Baturin G. N., 1988, GEOCHEMISTRY MANGANE
[9]   VARIATIONS OF ELEMENT DISTRIBUTION IN FERROMANGANESE NODULES AND ITS BEARING ON GROWTH-RATES [J].
BERNAT, M ;
CAUSSE, C ;
PERSEIL, EA ;
FERAUD, G .
MINERALIUM DEPOSITA, 1989, 24 (04) :258-269
[10]  
BLAIN CF, 1977, MINER SCI ENG, V9, P119