MEASURING RESIDUAL FUNCTIONAL-CAPACITY IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN PATIENTS BASED ON THE DICTIONARY OF OCCUPATIONAL TITLES

被引:44
作者
FISHBAIN, DA
ABDELMOTY, E
CUTLER, R
KHALIL, TM
SADEK, S
ROSOMOFF, RS
ROSOMOFF, HL
机构
[1] Departments of Psychiatry, Miami Beach, FL
[2] Departments of Neurological Surgery, Miami Beach, FL
[3] Industrial Engineering, University of Miami, School of Medicine Comprehensive Pain and Rehabilitation Center at South Shore Hospital, Miami Beach, FL
关键词
RESIDUAL FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY; CHRONIC PAIN; MEASUREMENT; DICTIONARY OF OCCUPATIONAL TITLES;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199404150-00002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This study designed and tested a functional battery based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). Objectives. Such a battery can be used to measure residual functional capacity (RFC) in chronic pain patients (CPP) and results can be matched against the demand minimum functional capacities (DMFC) of DOT jobs. Summary of Background Data. Physicians have difficulty translating medical impairment into functional limitation and thereby establishing the RFC of CPPs. Methods. The DOT, a USA government publication, provides information about physical demands of every USA job according to 36 factors and subfactors. The authors defined and developed a functional battery based on these factors/subfactors. This battery was tested on 67 consecutive CPPs to determine the percentage of CPPs able to pass specific job factors and the full battery and return to some DOT job, and evaluated the effects of pain on battery performance. The data were factor analyzed. Results. The battery determined of CPPs could perform DOT job factors and had the necessary RFC to be placed in a DOT job. The vast majority of CPPs could not pass the full battery and the presence of pain and original job classification predicted whether a CPP could perform a job factor. Factor analyses grouped the factors into four independent categories supporting the design of the battery. Conclusion. The battery can assess whether CPPs are able to return to work.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 880
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abdel-Moty E., Khalil T.M., Asfour S.S., Howard M., Rosomoff R.S., Rosomoff H.L., Effects of pain on psychomotor abilities, Advances in Ergonomics 8C Safety I, pp. 465-471, (1989)
  • [2] Battista M.E., Disability evaluations: Expectations of insurers and payors, J Disability, 1, pp. 168-177, (1990)
  • [3] Berkson M., Schultz A., Nachemson A., Ersson G., Voluntary strength of male adults with acute low back syndrome, Clin Orthop Rel Res, 129, pp. 84-95, (1977)
  • [4] Blankenship K.L., Functional Capacity Evaluation. The Procedure Manual, (1986)
  • [5] Edwards F.C., McCallum R.I., Taylor P.J., Editors. Fitness for work: The medical aspects, Oxford University Press, (1988)
  • [6] Feinstein A.L., Josephy B.R., Wells C.K., Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability, Ann Intern Med, 105, pp. 413-420, (1986)
  • [7] Foreman T.K., Baxter C.E., Traup J.G., Ratings of acceptable load and maximum isometric lifting strengths: The effects of repetition, Ergonomics, 27, pp. 1283-1288, (1984)
  • [8] Gamberale F., Maximum acceptable workloads for repetitive lifting tasks, Scand J Work Environ Health, 14, pp. 85-87, (1988)
  • [9] Gamboa A.M., Holland G.H., Tierney S.B., Assessing work and earning capacity, Adv Clin Rehabil, 2, pp. 6-36, (1988)
  • [10] Jette A.M., Deniston O.L., Inter-observer reliability of a functional status assessment instrument, J Chronic Dis, 31, pp. 573-580, (1978)