AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF THE RELATIVE ERROR MAGNITUDE IN 3 MEASURES OF CHANGE

被引:13
作者
WILLIAMS, RH
ZIMMERMAN, DW
RICH, JM
STEED, JL
机构
[1] CARLETON UNIV,OTTAWA K1S 5B6,ONTARIO,CANADA
[2] MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLL,MIAMI,FL
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00220973.1984.10806362
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 57
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE CHANGE - OR SHOULD WE [J].
CRONBACH, LJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 74 (01) :68-80
[2]  
Lord F. M., 1963, PROBLEMS MEASURING C
[3]   THE MEASUREMENT OF GROWTH [J].
LORD, FM .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1956, 16 (04) :421-437
[4]   CORRELATIONAL METHODS IN RESEARCH ON HUMAN LEARNING [J].
MANNING, WH ;
DUBOIS, PH .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1962, 15 (02) :287-321
[5]  
OCONNOR EF, 1972, REV EDUC RES, V42, P73
[6]   A BASE-FREE MEASURE OF CHANGE [J].
TUCKER, LR ;
DAMARIN, F ;
MESSICK, S .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1966, 31 (04) :457-457
[7]   THE RELATIVE ERROR MAGNITUDE IN 3 MEASURES OF CHANGE [J].
ZIMMERMAN, DW ;
WILLIAMS, RH .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1982, 47 (02) :141-147
[8]   GAIN SCORES IN RESEARCH CAN BE HIGHLY RELIABLE [J].
ZIMMERMAN, DW ;
WILLIAMS, RH .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1982, 19 (02) :149-154