GENETIC-VARIATION AND SUBSPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS OF MICHIGAN ELK (CERVUS-ELAPHUS)

被引:10
作者
GLENN, TC
SMITH, DR
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN, SCH NAT RESOURCES, ANN ARBOR, MI 48109 USA
[2] UNIV MICHIGAN, MOLEC SYSTEMAT LAB, ANN ARBOR, MI 48109 USA
关键词
CERVUS-ELAPHUS; MICHIGAN; GENETIC VARIATION; PROTEIN VARIATION;
D O I
10.2307/1382303
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Genetic variation of Michigan elk is examined by use of protein electrophoresis on cellulose acetate. Six western elk populations (Cervus elaphus nelsoni, Rocky Mountain elk) are surveyed and contrasted with Michigan elk. Significant differences in allele frequencies (chi2 = 227.20, d.f. = 28, P < 0.001) and moderate genetic variation exists among the elk herds examined (mean F(ST) = 0.100). However, no significant differences in allele frequencies and small genetic variation are found among the three populations in or near Yellowstone National Park (total chi2 = 6.360, d.f. = 4, P = 0.174; mean F(ST) = 0.034). Moreover, no significant differences are found when the reintroduced populations of Vermejo Park, New Mexico, and Wichita Mountains, Oklahoma, are included with the three populations from the Yellowstone area (total chi2 = 15.131, d.f. = 12, P = 0.234; mean F(ST) = 0.038). Significant differences in allele frequencies and moderate genetic variation exist among the elk populations when either or both of the reintroduced populations of Michigan or Mt. Taylor, New Mexico, are added to the analysis of the five other elk populations. Michigan elk have a unique PGM-1 allele not shared by any of the other elk populations examined, but the unique allele is likely to be homologous to alleles among Roosevelt elk known from previous studies. The claim that the Michigan elk herd descends from seven individuals from Yellowstone National Park or the National Elk Refuge is not supported by historic or genetic evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 792
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1972, STUDIES GENETICS 7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RESTORING EUROPEAN B, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x
[3]  
ARCHIE JW, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P678, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04265.x
[4]   MEASUREMENTS AND WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN MANITOBA ELK [J].
BLOOD, DA ;
LOVAAS, AL .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1966, 30 (01) :135-&
[5]   HETEROZYGOSITY IN YELLOWSTONE-PARK ELK, CERVUS-CANADENSIS [J].
CAMERON, DG ;
VYSE, ER .
BIOCHEMICAL GENETICS, 1978, 16 (7-8) :651-657
[6]  
Chesser R.K., 1987, P168
[7]  
COTHRAN EG, 1983, EVOLUTION, V37, P282, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05538.x
[8]  
DRATCH P, 1985, ROYAL SOC NZ B, V22, P37
[9]   GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN 4 EUROPEAN SUBSPECIES OF RED DEER (CERVUS-ELAPHUS L) [J].
GYLLENSTEN, U ;
RYMAN, N ;
REUTERWALL, C ;
DRATCH, P .
HEREDITY, 1983, 51 (DEC) :561-580
[10]   BIGHORN LAMB MORTALITY - PREDATION, INBREEDING, AND POPULATION EFFECTS [J].
HASS, CC .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1989, 67 (03) :699-705