COLOR DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY OF RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS - IS THE RESISTIVE INDEX A DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL IN THE LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP

被引:9
作者
BREITENSEHER, M
HELBICH, T
KAINBERGER, F
HUBSCH, P
TRATTNIG, S
TRAINDL, O
MOSTBECK, G
机构
[1] LUDWIG BOLZMANN INST RADIOL PHYS TUMORDIAGNOST,VIENNA,AUSTRIA
[2] UNIV VIENNA,INNERE MED KLIN 3,A-1010 VIENNA,AUSTRIA
来源
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN | 1994年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY; TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED-STATES STUDIES; DOPPLER STUDIES;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1004000
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The retrospective study under report assessed the diagnostic capability of colour Doppler sonography (CDS) with measurement of the resistive index (RI) in the long-term follow-up of patients with renal allografts. 210 CDS examinations were performed in 115 patients. The time since transplantation ranged from 6 months to 22 years. The RI was correlated to laboratory parameters of renal allograft function (serum creatinine, urinary protein levels and serum-cyclosporine). In 97 of 210 examinations, serum creatinine was elevated (> 1,5 mg % or an increase of more then 0,3 mg % within the last 6 months). In 35 out of these examinations RI was > 70 %, in 62 RI was less-than-or-equal-to 70 %. Thus, with a threshold RI of 70 %, sensitivity of the RI in the diagnosis of renal allograft dysfunction is 36 % and specificity 62 %, respectively. There was no significant difference in the RI between examinations of allografts with normal function (68,2 % +/- 7,5 %) and those with dysfunction (68,5 % +/- 8,5 %). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the RI and any of the laboratory parameters. CDS with calculation of the RI cannot differentiate in the long-term follow-up between allografts with normal function and those with dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 28
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS - PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY [J].
ALLEN, KS ;
JORKASKY, DK ;
ARGER, PH ;
VELCHIK, MG ;
GRUMBACH, K ;
COLEMAN, BG ;
MINTZ, MC ;
BETSCH, SE ;
PERLOFF, LJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :371-376
[2]   EVALUATION OF RENAL-TRANSPLANTS WITH PULSED DOPPLER DUPLEX SONOGRAPHY [J].
BERLAND, LL ;
LAWSON, TL ;
ADAMS, MB ;
MELROSE, BL ;
FOLEY, WD .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1982, 1 (06) :215-222
[3]   THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ACUTE RENAL-TRANSPLANT REJECTION AND CYCLOSPORINE NEPHROTOXICITY - VALUE OF DUPLEX SONOGRAPHY [J].
BUCKLEY, AR ;
COOPERBERG, PL ;
REEVE, CE ;
MAGIL, AB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 149 (03) :521-525
[4]   DOPPLER AND COLOR DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN RENAL-TRANSPLANTS - CHRONIC REJECTION [J].
DEANE, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1992, 20 (08) :539-544
[5]   NONINVASIVE SURVEILLANCE OF ALLOGRAFTED KIDNEYS BY ULTRASONIC DUPLEX SCANNING [J].
DEGAETANO, AM ;
BOLDRINI, G ;
NANNI, G ;
SERINO, F ;
GIOVANNINI, I ;
CASTAGNETO, M .
ANGIOLOGY, 1989, 40 (08) :705-715
[6]   DUPLEX DOPPLER US OF RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS - CAUSES OF ELEVATED RESISTIVE INDEX [J].
DON, S ;
KOPECKY, KK ;
FILO, RS ;
LEAPMAN, SB ;
THOMALLA, JV ;
JONES, JA ;
KLATTE, EC .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (03) :709-712
[7]   COLOR DUPLEX US AND RESISTIVE INDEX IN RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS WITH DYSFUNCTION [J].
FLUCKIGER, F ;
STEINER, H ;
HORN, S ;
RATSCHEK, M ;
DEU, E .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1990, 153 (06) :692-697
[8]   DUPLEX DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY OF RENAL-TRANSPLANTS - LACK OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY IN ESTABLISHING PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS [J].
GENKINS, SM ;
SANFILIPPO, FP ;
CARROLL, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (03) :535-539
[9]   WISHING WONT MAKE IT SO - DUPLEX DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY IN THE EVALUATION OF RENAL-TRANSPLANT DYSFUNCTION [J].
GRANT, EG ;
PERRELLA, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) :538-539
[10]   PYRAMIDAL APPEARANCE AND RESISTIVE INDEX - INSENSITIVE AND NONSPECIFIC SONOGRAPHIC INDICATORS OF RENAL-TRANSPLANT REJECTION [J].
KELCZ, F ;
POZNIAK, MA ;
PIRSCH, JD ;
OBERLY, TD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) :531-535