QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT - A COMPARISON OF 4 QUESTIONNAIRES - FOR MEASURING IMPROVEMENTS AFTER TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT

被引:17
作者
BORSTLAP, M [1 ]
ZANT, JL [1 ]
VANSOESBERGEN, RM [1 ]
VANDERKORST, JKL [1 ]
机构
[1] JAN VAN BREEMEN INST,CTR RHEUMATOL & REHABIL,1056 AB AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
TOTAL HIP; AIMS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALES; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1007/BF02208079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Three experimental questionnaires were compared with the Influence of Rheumatic Diseases on Health and Lifestyle (IRGL) questionnaire, a Dutch version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Sixty-two patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 35 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), all of whom underwent hip arthroplasty, completed the study. Results showed that visual analogue scales for pain, stiffness, fatigue, and anxiety were strongly correlated with a number of the IRGL scales. Patient preference scales were sensitive to change and provided additional information on aspects of the patients' quality of life (QOL) that were felt to be important by the patients themselves, The questionnaire on performance in various roles in life was insensitive to change. In existing questionnaires, there is an attempt to represent the concept of QOL in terms of its most important aspects. Such realizations of the concept of QOL are not entirely suitable for application in clinical trials. The IRGL is overly complex, and its sometimes comprehensive scales do not deal with the possible effects of treatment. Neither of these properties is conducive to sensitivity to change. Visual analogue scales reduce the complexity, A simpler representation of QOL that can evaluate aspects relevant to treatment is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 20
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bergner M., Measurement of health status, Med Care, 23, pp. 696-704, (1985)
[2]  
Bell M.J., Bombardier C., Tugwell P., Measurement of functional status, quality of life, and utility in rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Rheum, 33, pp. 591-601, (1990)
[3]  
Bergner M., Bobbitt R.A., Carter W.B., The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure, Med Care, 19, pp. 787-805, (1981)
[4]  
Hunt S., McKenna S., McEwen J., Willia J., Papp E., The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations, Soc Sci Med, 15 A, pp. 221-229, (1981)
[5]  
Chambers L.W., MacDonald L.A., Tugwell P., Buchanan W.W., Kraag G., The McMaster Health Index questionnaire as a measure of quality of life for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, J. Rheumatol, 9, pp. 780-784, (1982)
[6]  
Walker S.R., Rosser R.M., Quality of Life: Assessment and Application, pp. 205-222, (1988)
[7]  
Mason J.H., Weener J.L., Gertman P.M., Meenan R.F., Health status in chronic disease: A comparative study of rheumatoid arthritis, J. Rheumatol, 10, pp. 763-768, (1983)
[8]  
Ahlmen E.M., Bengtsson C.B., Sullivan B.M., Bjelle A., A comparison of overall health between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a population with and without rheumatoid arthritis, Scand J Rheumatol, 19, pp. 413-421, (1990)
[9]  
Meenan R.F., Anderson J.J., Kazis L.E., Egger M.J., Altz-Smith M., Samuelson C.O., Willkens R.F., Solsky M.A., Hayes S.P., Blocka K.L., Weinstein A., Guttadauria M., Kaplan S.B., Klippel J., Outcome assessment in clinical trials
[10]  
Evidence for the sensitivity of health status measure, Arthritis Rheum, 27, pp. 1344-1352, (1984)