BIOFILM DETACHMENT MECHANISMS IN A LIQUID-FLUIDIZED BED

被引:146
作者
CHANG, HT
RITTMANN, BE
AMAR, D
HEIM, R
EHLINGER, O
LESTY, Y
机构
[1] UNIV ILLINOIS,DEPT CIVIL ENGN,URBANA,IL 61801
[2] LYONNAISE EAUX,CENT LAB,F-78230 LE PECQ,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bit.260380508
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bed fluidization offers the possibility of gaining the advantages of fixed-film biological processes without the disadvantage of pore clogging. However, the biofilm detachment rate, due to hydrodynamics and particle-to-particle attrition, is very poorly understood for fluidized-bed biofilm processes. In this work, a two-phase fluidized-bed biofilm was operated under a constant surface loading (0.09 mg total organic carbon/cm2 day) and with a range of bed height (H), fluid velocities (U), and support-particle concentrations (C(p)). Direct measurements were made for the specific biofilm loss rate coefficient (b(s)) and the total biofilm accumulation (X(f)L(f)). A hydrodynamic model allowed independent determination of the biofilm density (X(f)), biofilm thickness (L(f)), liquid shear stress (tau), and Reynolds number (Re). Multiple regression analysis of the results showed that increased particle-to-particle attrition, proportional to C(p), and increased turbulence, described by Re, caused the biofilms to be denser and thinner. The specific detachment rate coefficient (b(s)) increased as C(p) and Re increased. Almost all of the b(s) values were larger than predicted by a previous model derived for smooth biofilms on a nonfluidized surface. Therefore, the turbulence and attrition of bed fluidization appear to be dominant detachment mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 506
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   EXPANSION OF A FLUIDIZED-BED CONTAINING BIOMASS [J].
ANDREWS, GF ;
TIEN, C .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1979, 25 (04) :720-723
[2]  
CHANG HT, 1988, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V60, P362
[3]   DYNAMICS OF BIOFILM PROCESSES - METHODS [J].
CHARACKLIS, WG ;
TRULEAR, MG ;
BRYERS, JD ;
ZELVER, N .
WATER RESEARCH, 1982, 16 (07) :1207-1216
[4]  
DRAPER NR, 1981, APPLIED REGRESSION A
[5]  
GANTZER CJ, 1989, STRUCTURE FUNCTION B, P73
[6]   FLUIDIZATION AND REACTOR BIOMASS CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DENITRIFICATION FLUIDIZED-BED BIOFILM REACTOR [J].
MULCAHY, LT ;
SHIEH, WK .
WATER RESEARCH, 1987, 21 (04) :451-458
[7]  
Rich L.G., 1961, UNIT OPERATIONS SANI
[8]  
Richardson J.F., 1954, T I CHEM ENG-LOND, V32, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80006-8
[9]   COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF BIOFILM REACTOR TYPES [J].
RITTMANN, BE .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1982, 24 (06) :1341-1370
[10]   THE EFFECT OF SHEAR-STRESS ON BIOFILM LOSS RATE [J].
RITTMANN, BE .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1982, 24 (02) :501-506