COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED HEALTH-STATUS AND CONVENTIONAL FUNCTIONAL-EVALUATION IN STABLE PATIENTS WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE

A cross-sectional study of stable coronary hospital patients was carried out to compare perceived health assessment with conventional clinical measures; 93 consecutive patients were studied, 45 of whom had undergone bypass surgery. Exercise tests and clinical functional classification were obtained together with blind concurrent self-responses to the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), a measure of distress. Coronary arteriography was available for all patients. Patients with negative exercise tests had lower NHP scores (lower levels of distress) than those with positive or inconclusive tests, especially in the energy, pain and physical mobility NHP dimensions (p < 0.01). High Spearman correlation coefficients were found between exercise performance and energy (r(s) = -0.51) and pain (r(s) = -0.36) scores. This correlation was closer than that found with clinical functional class. In these patients, exercise performance closely correlated with perceived distress. Self-perceived health status measures may improve the evaluation of coronary patients based on clinical assessment alone.