A SHIFTED MULTIPLICATIVE MODEL CLUSTER-ANALYSIS FOR GROUPING ENVIRONMENTS WITHOUT GENOTYPIC RANK CHANGE

被引:38
作者
CROSSA, J
CORNELIUS, PL
SEYEDSADR, M
BYRNE, P
机构
[1] UNIV KENTUCKY,DEPT AGRON,LEXINGTON,KY 40546
[2] UNIV KENTUCKY,DEPT STAT,LEXINGTON,KY 40546
[3] UNIV KENTUCKY,DEPT RADIAT ONCOL,LEXINGTON,KY 40546
关键词
GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; CROSSOVER INTERACTION; SEPARABILITY; SHIFTED MULTIPLICATIVE MODEL; DISTANCE MEASURE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ZEA-MAYS L;
D O I
10.1007/BF00220916
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The shifted multiplicative model (SHMM) is used with a cluster method to identify subsets of sites in an international maize (Zea mays L.) trial without genotypic rank-change. For cluster analysis, distance between two sites is defined as the residual sum of squares after fitting SHMM with one multiplicative term (SHMM1) if SHMM1 does not show genotypic rank-change. However, if SHMM1 does show genotypic rank-change, the distance between two sites is defined as the smaller of the sums of squares owing to genotypes within each of the two sites. Calculation of distance between two sites is facilitated by using the site regression model with one multiplicative term (SREG1), which can be reparameterized as SHMM1 when only two sites are considered. The dichotomous splitting procedure, used on the dendrogram obtained from cluster analysis, will first perform SHMM analyses on each of the last two cluster groups to join (end of the dendrogram). If SHMM1 does not give an adequate fit, the next step is to move down the branches of the tree until groups of sites (clusters) are found to which SHMM1 provides an adequate fit and primary effects of sites are all of the same sign. Five final groups of sites to which SHMM1 provides an adequate fit and primary effects of sites are all of the same sign were obtained. The procedure appears to be useful in identifying subsets of sites in which genotypic rank-change interactions are negligible.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 586
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
AZZALINI A, 1984, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V46, P335
[2]  
Baker R. J., 1990, GENOTYPE BY ENV INTE, P42
[3]   TESTS FOR CROSSOVER GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENTAL INTERACTIONS [J].
BAKER, RJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1988, 68 (02) :405-410
[4]   USING THE SHIFTED MULTIPLICATIVE MODEL TO SEARCH FOR SEPARABILITY IN CROP CULTIVAR TRIALS [J].
CORNELIUS, PL ;
SEYEDSADR, M ;
CROSSA, J .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1992, 84 (1-2) :161-172
[5]  
Crossa J., 1990, Advances in Agronomy, V44, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60818-4
[6]  
Freeman G.H., 1990, GENOTYPE ENV INTERAC, P118
[7]   TESTING FOR QUALITATIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TREATMENT EFFECTS AND PATIENT SUBSETS [J].
GAIL, M ;
SIMON, R .
BIOMETRICS, 1985, 41 (02) :361-372
[8]   THE ANALYSIS OF NONADDITIVITY IN 2-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE [J].
GOODMAN, LA ;
HABERMAN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 85 (409) :139-145
[9]   JOINT ANALYSIS OF GENOTYPIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL-EFFECTS [J].
GREGORIUS, HR ;
NAMKOONG, G .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1986, 72 (03) :413-422
[10]   ANALYSIS OF A 2-WAY MODEL WITH INTERACTION AND NO REPLICATION [J].
JOHNSON, DE ;
GRAYBILL, FA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1972, 67 (340) :862-868