ON THE REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF CLIMATE MITIGATION COSTS: THE IMPACT OF DELAYED COOPERATIVE ACTION

被引:11
作者
Aboumahboub, Tino [1 ]
Luderer, Gunnar [1 ]
Kriegler, Elmar [1 ]
Leimbach, Marian [1 ]
Bauer, Nico [1 ]
Pehl, Michaja [1 ]
Baumstark, Lavinia [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Regional mitigation costs; delayed cooperative action; burden sharing; integrated assessment models;
D O I
10.1142/S2010007814400028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the results of the climate-energy-economy model, Regionalized Model of Investment and Technological Development (REMIND), to assess the regional costs of climate-change mitigation for reaching the 2 degrees C target with a medium to high likelihood. We assume that the global climate regime remains fragmented until 2020 after which a global mitigation target is adopted. We decompose the regional mitigation costs into (a) domestic and energy trade effects and (b) permit trade effects. Delaying cooperative action affects domestic costs by increasing the energy system's costs as a consequence of lock-in of carbon-intensive infrastructures. This is particularly true in developing countries with low near-term emissions reduction commitments. In a global cap-and-trade system, the effect of delayed action highly depends on whether or not the regions are over-or under-allocated with emissions allowances in the long term. Those with allowances exceeding their long-term emissions will likely benefit from the delay, while others suffer the consequences of higher long-term carbon prices.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies [J].
Bauer, Nico ;
Brecha, Robert J. ;
Luderer, Gunnar .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (42) :16805-16810
[2]   The REMIND-R model: the role of renewables in the low-carbon transformation-first-best vs. second-best worlds [J].
Bauer, Nico ;
Baumstark, Lavinia ;
Leimbach, Marian .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 114 (01) :145-168
[3]  
Blanford G, 2013, CLIMATIC CH IN PRESS
[4]  
Clarke LE, 2007, SCENARIOS GREENHOUSE
[5]   International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios [J].
Clarke, Leon ;
Edmonds, Jae ;
Krey, Volker ;
Richels, Richard ;
Rose, Steven ;
Tavoni, Massimo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 :S64-S81
[6]   THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) :1-44
[7]   THE COPENHAGEN ACCORD/CANCUN AGREEMENTS EMISSION PLEDGES FOR 2020: EXPLORING ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS [J].
Dellinky, Rob ;
Briner, Gregory ;
Clapp, Christa .
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2011, 2 (01) :53-78
[8]  
den Elzen M. G. J, 2010, EVALUATION COPENHAGE
[9]   Regional abatement action and costs under allocation schemes for emission allowances for achieving low CO2-equivalent concentrations [J].
den Elzen, Michel G. J. ;
Lucas, Paul L. ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 90 (03) :243-268
[10]  
Edenhofer O, 2010, ENERG J, V31, P11