CRITICAL PETIOLE NITRATE-NITROGEN FOR LINT YIELD AND ENHANCED MATURITY IN PIMA COTTON

被引:12
作者
TEWOLDE, H [1 ]
FERNANDEZ, CJ [1 ]
FOSS, DC [1 ]
UNRUH, LG [1 ]
机构
[1] TEXAS A&M UNIV,DEPT SOIL & CROP SCI,COLLEGE STN,TX 77843
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700020014x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Petiole NO3-N concentration (PNN) has been recommended as an indicator of midseason N deficiency in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Its use in Pima cotton (G. barbadense L.) management, especially when early maturity is the goal, is not well documented. A 3-yr study evaluated PNN as an indicator of N status in Pima cotton in order to identify a critical minimum PNN level for yield and early maturity. Treatments were five preplant applied N rates of 0 to 180 kg ha(-1) in 1990 and 0 to 269 kg ha(-1) in 1991 and 1992. The PNN was measured throughout boil development, starting approximate to 2 wk before or at first flower. Applied N significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) affected PNN in 1991 and 1992, when residual soil N was low but not in 1990, when residual N was high; differences among treatments in 1991 and 1992 were largest during early flowering. PNN was a good indicator of plant N status within but not across seasons. Based on early-flowering samples, the critical PNN level for lint yield was 3.84 g kg(-1) in 1991 and only 1.75 g kg(-1) in 1992; in 1990, residual soil N alone resulted in PNN much higher than the critical levels in the other years. PNN < 2 g kg(-1) in 1991 and < 1 g kg(-1) in 1992 resulted in earlier maturity, but also resulted in less lint yield. Pima cotton PNN did not exceed an average of 11 g kg(-1), in contrast to 24 to 30 g kg(-1) reported for upland cotton. Plant growth or petiole anatomical variables that cause year-to-year variation in PNN should be identified and the necessary normalization made before PNN can be used as a midseason diagnostic tool in Pima cotton.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 227
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF COTTON RESPONSE TO RATES, SOURCES, AND TIMING OF NITROGEN APPLICATION BY PETIOLE ANALYSIS [J].
AMER, F ;
ABUAMIN, H .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1969, 61 (04) :635-&
[2]   FAMILY OF MODELS INVOLVING INTERSECTING STRAIGHT LINES AND CONCOMITANT EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS USEFUL IN EVALUATING RESPONSE TO FERTILIZER NUTRIENTS [J].
ANDERSON, RL ;
NELSON, LA .
BIOMETRICS, 1975, 31 (02) :303-318
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE
[4]   NITROGEN EFFECTS ON COTTON .2. SOIL AND PETIOLE ANALYSES [J].
GARDNER, BR ;
TUCKER, TC .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1967, 31 (06) :785-&
[5]   INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN, NARROW ROWS, AND PLANT POPULATION ON COTTON YIELD AND GROWTH [J].
KOLI, SE ;
MORRILL, LG .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1976, 68 (06) :897-901
[6]   NITRATE MONITORING FOR COTTON LINT PRODUCTION ON A TYPIC PALEUDULT [J].
LUTRICK, MC ;
PEACOCK, HA ;
CORNELL, JA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (06) :1041-1046
[7]   SEASONAL NITRATE-NITROGEN CONTENT OF COTTON PETIOLES AS AFFECTED BY NITROGEN APPLICATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO YIELD [J].
MACKENZIE, AJ ;
STOCKINGER, KR ;
KRANTZ, BA ;
SPENCER, WF .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1963, 55 (01) :55-&
[8]  
MAPLES LR, 1990, NITROGEN NUTRITION C, P59
[9]  
MAPLES RL, 1977, ARK AGR EXP STN B, V825
[10]   NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION OF COTTON CULTIVARS OF DIFFERING MATURITY [J].
MCCONNELL, JS ;
BAKER, WH ;
MILLER, DM ;
FRIZZELL, BS ;
VARVIL, JJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (06) :1151-1156