A nonparametric subject-specific population method for deconvolution .2. External validation

被引:11
作者
Fattinger, KE
Verotta, D
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT PHARM & PHARMACEUT CHEM,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
来源
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS | 1995年 / 23卷 / 06期
关键词
mixed effect; approximation; model misspecification;
D O I
10.1007/BF02353464
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
A lot of attention has been given in the past to deconvolution and in particular to its nonparametric variants. In a companion paper (1), we present a fully nonparametric deconvolution method in which subject specificity is explicitly taken into account. To do so we use so-called ''longitudinal splines.'' A longitudinal spline is a nonparametric function composed of a template spline, in common to all subjects, and of a distortion spline representing the difference of the subject's function from the template. In this paper, we concentrate on testing and documenting the performance of this nonparametric methodology in terms of the approximation of unknown functions. We simulated population data using parametric functions, and use longitudinal splines to recover the unknown functions. We consider different estimation methods including (1) parametric nonlinear mixed effect, (2) least squares, and (3) two stage. Methods 2-3 are more robust than Method 1, and obtain reliable estimates of the unknown functions. The lack of robustness of Method 1 appears to be due to the misspecifications of the distribution of the subject's parameters. Results also suggest that in a data-rich situation nonparametric nonlinear mixed-effect models should be preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 634
页数:24
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]   POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC DATA AND PARAMETER-ESTIMATION BASED ON THEIR 1ST 2 STATISTICAL MOMENTS .1. [J].
BEAL, SL .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1984, 15 (1-2) :173-193
[3]  
BEAL SL, 1992, NONMEM USERS GUIDE 7
[4]   A COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD AND GENERALIZED LEAST-SQUARES IN A HETEROSCEDASTIC LINEAR-MODEL [J].
CARROLL, RJ ;
RUPPERT, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 77 (380) :878-882
[5]  
DAVIDIAN M, 1992, NHNIX PROGRAM MAXIMU
[6]  
FATTINGER KE, 1993, 33 U CAL DEP BIOST
[7]  
FATTINGER KE, 1995, J PHARMACOKIN BIOPHA, V23
[8]  
MALLET A, 1986, BIOMETRIKA, V73, P645
[9]  
Muller HG, 1988, NONPARAMETRIC REGRES
[10]  
*STAT SCI INC, 1991, S PLUS