Identification of Gifted Students in the United States Today: A Look at State Definitions, Policies, and Practices

被引:126
作者
McClain, Mary-Catherine [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
gifted; gifted identification; gifted policy; alternative assessment;
D O I
10.1080/15377903.2012.643757
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Definitions of what constitute students who are gifted and talented as well as policies and procedures to identify these high-ability students play a critical role in determining which individuals actually receive gifted services. This article reports on a national survey of how state policies and practices define giftedness, identify gifted students, and accommodate for gifted minority group students. Results indicate substantial changes in definitions and categories of giftedness over the past decade. Results also reveal variability in identification methods, with a majority of states using a 3-5% cutscore for demarcating giftedness while endorsing a multiple cutoff or averaging approach to gifted decision making. Most noteworthy is the fact that at present, no state advocates using a single-score decision-making model for gifted classification. The authors discuss the implications for school psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 88
页数:30
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   To no longer educate the gifted: Programming for gifted students beyond the era of inclusionism [J].
Bernal, EM .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2003, 47 (03) :183-191
[2]  
Borland J. H., 2003, RETHINKING GIFTED ED, P105
[3]   Myth 2: The Gifted Constitute 3% to 5% of the Population. Moreover, Giftedness Equals High IQ, Which Is a Stable Measure of Aptitude Spinal Tap Psychometrics in Gifted Education [J].
Borland, James H. .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2009, 53 (04) :236-238
[4]   A Five-State Analysis of Gifted Education Policies [J].
Brown, Elissa ;
Avery, Linda ;
Van Tassel-Baska, Joyce ;
Worley, Bess, II ;
Stambaugh, Tamra .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2006, 29 (01) :11-23
[5]   Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students [J].
Brown, SW ;
Renzulli, JS ;
Gubbins, EJ ;
Siegle, D ;
Zhang, WL ;
Chen, CH .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2005, 49 (01) :68-79
[6]   Myth 3: A Family of Identification Myths Your Sample Must Be the Same as the Population. There Is a "Silver Bullet" in Identification. There Must Be "Winners" and "Losers" in Identification and Programming [J].
Callahan, Carolyn M. .
GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2009, 53 (04) :239-241
[7]  
Cassidy J., 1992, GIFTED CHILD Q, V15, P46
[8]   Guidelines for Developing an Academic Acceleration Policy [J].
Colangelo, Nicholas ;
Assouline, Susan G. ;
Marron, Maureen A. ;
Castellano, Jaime A. ;
Clinkenbeard, Pamela R. ;
Rogers, Karen ;
Calvert, Eric ;
Malek, Rosanne ;
Smith, Donnajo .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ACADEMICS, 2010, 21 (02) :180-203
[9]  
Council of Exceptional Children-The Association for the Gifted, 2010, GROWTH ACH ADV STUD
[10]  
Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted & National Association for Gifted Children, 2007, STAT STAT GIFT TAL E, P2006