MULTIPLE-DISCREPANCIES THEORY VERSUS RESOURCE THEORY

被引：23

作者：

SCHULZ, W

机构：

[1] Institut Fuer Soziologie, Universitaet Wien, Wien

来源：

SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH | 1995年 / 34卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/BF01078971

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

The explanatory value of two theories expounding the quality of life are compared and discussed. To make this comparison possible, it is necessary to distinguish between rather clear theoretical assumptions and avoid a mix of theories: the variance explained by comparisons (multiple discrepancies) is compared with the variance explained by resource. Data obtained from the Vienna Student Survey (n = 350) are presented. Although multiple-discrepancies theory (MDT) does explain far more variance than the resource approach, critical comments and proposals complete the study.

引用

页码：153 / 169

页数：17

共 10 条

[1] ATTITUDE-BEHAVIOR RELATIONS - THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL-RESEARCH [J].

AJZEN, I ;

FISHBEIN, M .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1977, 84 (05) :888-918

[2]

Andrews F.M., 1976, NEW YORK LONDON PLEN

[3] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING [J].

DIENER, E .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 95 (03) :542-575

[4]

DREWNOWSKI J, 1974, MEASURING PLANNING Q

[5]

Michalos A. C., 1991, GLOBAL REPORT STUDEN, V1-4

[6]

Popper K.R., 1959, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY

[7]

SCHULZ W, 1985, LEBENSQUALITAT OSTER

[8]

SCHULZ W, 1978, SOZIALKONTAKTE GROSS

[9]

SCHUMANN DW, 1991, J ADVERTISING RES, V31, P17

[10]

Veenhoven R., 1984, CONDITIONS HAPPINESS

← 1 →