AMERICAN AMBIVALENCE TOWARDS ABORTION POLICY - DEVELOPMENT OF A HETEROSKEDASTIC PROBIT MODEL OF COMPETING VALUES

被引:245
作者
ALVAREZ, RM [1 ]
BREHM, J [1 ]
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,DURHAM,NC 27706
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2111669
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Theory: Using elaboration-likelihood models and insights from the recent core beliefs literature, we show that conflicting core beliefs lead to ambivalence about policy choices. Hypotheses: Policy choices about abortion are heterogeneous. This heterogeneity across individuals is a function of the underlying conflict in their beliefs about the role of women and the sanctity of human life. Methods: A heteroskedastic probit model is developed to test the hypotheses. Results: Heterogeneity is observed for six of seven abortion policy choices; when core values conflict, respondents are more ambivalent in their policy responses and more difficult for our standard models to predict.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1082
页数:28
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   MASS POLITICAL-ATTITUDES AND SURVEY RESPONSE [J].
ACHEN, CH .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1975, 69 (04) :1218-1231
[2]   UNCERTAINTY AND POLITICAL PERCEPTIONS [J].
ALVAREZ, RM ;
FRANKLIN, CH .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1994, 56 (03) :671-688
[3]  
ALVAREZ RM, 1992, THESIS DUKE U
[4]  
AMEMIYA T, 1981, J EC LIT DEC, P1483
[5]   ISSUE VOTING UNDER UNCERTAINTY - AN EMPIRICAL-TEST [J].
BARTELS, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1986, 30 (04) :709-728
[6]  
Brehm John, 1993, PHANTOM RESPONDENTS
[7]  
Carmines Edward, 1989, ISSUE EVOLUTION
[8]   THE 2 FACES OF ISSUE VOTING [J].
CARMINES, EG ;
STIMSON, JA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1980, 74 (01) :78-91
[9]   BLACKS, WHITES, AND ATTITUDES TOWARD ABORTION [J].
COMBS, MW ;
WELCH, S .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1982, 46 (04) :510-520
[10]  
Converse P.E., 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT