BIRTH-WEIGHT AND SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL-NEEDS - EFFECTS OF AN INCREASE IN THE SURVIVAL OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS IN LONDON

被引:7
作者
KEMPLEY, ST
DIFFLEY, FS
RUIZ, G
LOWE, D
EVANS, BG
GAMSU, HR
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL HOSP,DEPT COMMUNITY CHILD HLTH,CAMBERWELL HLTH AUTHOR,LONDON,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL HOSP,DEPT COMMUNITY MED & EPIDEMIOL,CAMBERWELL HLTH AUTHOR,LONDON,ENGLAND
[3] UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL HOSP,CHILDREN NATIONWIDE NEONATAL CTR,CAMBERWELL HLTH AUTHOR,LONDON,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.49.1.33
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives - To assess the contribution of children with different birth weights to special educational needs within a single health district, and to determine whether this pattern changed over the time when the survival of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants was increasing. Setting - An inner London health district. Study design - A cohort of children born to local parents between January 1974 and December 1980 was selected from birth notifications, including only those infants who survived for more than one month. Community child health records were then inspected to identify children from the cohort who had been formally assessed for special educational needs before their 8th birthday. The risk of special educational needs was compared for the years 1974-77 and 1977-80 (the first and second halves of the period studied). Subjects - The infant cohort consisted of 31846 children. Altogether 260 (0.8%) of these were later assessed formally. Results - VLBW infants were 4.4 times more likely to be assessed than normal birthweight infants. Formal assessment within the district occurred in three of 68 VLBW infants from the first half of the period studied, and three of 120 from the second half. Conclusion - Although VLBW infants are at higher risk, an increase in their survival was not associated with any increase in their contribution to the group with special educational needs within our district. Their contribution, as a group, to the total number of children with special educational needs is very small.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 37
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ALBERMAN E, 1982, LANCET, V1, P606
[2]  
COHEN SE, 1983, CHILD DEV, V54, P1242
[3]  
MADDOCK CR, 1987, LANCET, V2, P1254
[4]   NEONATAL FOLLOW-UP OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT EXTREMELY LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS TO SCHOOL AGE - A CRITICAL OVERVIEW [J].
ORNSTEIN, M ;
OHLSSON, A ;
EDMONDS, J ;
ASZTALOS, E .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 80 (8-9) :741-748
[5]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE [J].
PHAROAH, POD ;
STEVENSON, RC ;
COOKE, RWI ;
SANDU, B .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 1988, 63 (07) :715-718
[6]  
POWELL TG, 1986, LANCET, V1, P539
[7]  
RANTAKALLIO P, 1985, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V27, P655
[8]  
STEWART AL, 1981, LANCET, V1, P1038