PHYSICIANS ATTITUDES TOWARDS LIVING WILLS AND CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION

被引:52
作者
BRUNETTI, LL
CARPEROS, SD
WESTLUND, RE
机构
[1] Department of Internal Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, 28232-2861, NC
[2] the Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
关键词
LIVING WILLS; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; ADVANCE CARE DIRECTIVES; FORGOING LIFE-SUPPORT; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF02597430
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine whether a physician's familiarity with the living will directly relates to an expressed willingness to discuss resuscitation issues with patients. Design: Survey of selected primary care and medical sub-specialist physicians most likely to care for seriously or terminally ill patients. Setting: Private-practice clinicians practicing in an urban county. Participants: Internists, family practitioners, cardiologists, oncologists, and neurologists in private practice. Interventions: None. Results: Almost all responding physicians (97.2%) knew of the living will, although few (13.5%) had executed one for themselves. Most were willing to keep a copy of their patients' living wills with their office records. However, only a few physicians (20%) indicated they routinely discussed extraordinary care issues with their patients. In fact, most (70%) reported they rarely or never discussed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with their patients. With terminally ill patients, physicians initiative was greater: 69% reported discussing resuscitation preferences. Comparable discussions with elderly patients were undertaken only if the physician believed they would be warranted by the clinical circumstances. When questioned about their own sentiments towards resuscitation, most physicians indicated they would not want CPR if they were terminally ill (86%) or mentally incompetent (93%). A similar number (92%) would refuse artificial feeding if permanently comatose. Conclusions: Many physicians recognize the importance of living wills as an expression of patient treatment preferences. Nevertheless, discussion of patient preferences is unlikely because of physicians' reluctance, except in limited circumstances, to initiate a dialogue about life-sustaining measures. Because patients also are often unwilling to begin such discussions, better methods of facilitating discussion of CPR and other extraordinary health care measures must be sought.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 329
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Deciding to forgo life-sustaining treatment: ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions, pp. 231-47, (1983)
  • [2] A report by the Hastings Center, (1987)
  • [3] Emanuel L.L., Emanuel E.J., The medical directive: a new comprehensive advance care document, JAMA, 261, pp. 3288-93, (1989)
  • [4] Nobel S., Ahronheim J.C., The medical directive [letter], JAMA, 263, (1990)
  • [5] Orentlicher D., Cruzan v. Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective, JAMA, 262, pp. 2928-30, (1989)
  • [6] Frankl D., Oye R.K., Bellamy P.E., Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life support: a survey of 200 medical inpatients, Am J Med, 86, pp. 645-8, (1989)
  • [7] Davidson K.W., Hackler C., Caradine D.R., McCord R.S., Physicians’ attitudes on advance directives, JAMA, 262, pp. 2415-9, (1989)
  • [8] Kouwenhoven W.B., Jude J.R., Knickerbocher G.G., Closed-chest cardiac massage, JAMA, 173, pp. 1064-7, (1960)
  • [9] Blackhall L.J., Must we always use CPR?, N Engl J Med, 317, pp. 1281-4, (1987)
  • [10] Moss A.H., Informing the patient about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: when the risks outweigh the benefits, J Gen Intern Med, 4, pp. 349-55, (1989)