POSTOPERATIVE SCREENING FOR ANASTOMOTIC RECURRENCE OF ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY

被引:40
作者
CATALANO, MF
SIVAK, MV
RICE, TW
VANDAM, J
机构
[1] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT GASTROENTEROL & THORAC SURG,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[2] ST LUKES HOSP,MILWAUKEE,WI
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70007-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma is well established. Alternatively, the role of EUS in the early diagnosis of anastomotic recurrence is less well accepted. Methods: EUS was used to evaluate 30 asymptomatic and 10 symptomatic patients (i.e., with dysphagia) who had previously undergone resection of esophageal carcinoma. Results: There were 3 (10%) unsuspected anastomotic recurrences in the asymptomatic group. EUS correctly identified locally recurrent cancer in all cases, whereas endoscopy confirmed the presence of only one anastomotic recurrence. Computed tomography was not diagnostic in any of the three recurrences. Sensitivity of EUS for recurrence of esophageal carcinoma was 100% compared with 33% for endoscopic diagnosis while the specificity was 96% for EUS compared with 100% for endoscopic biopsy. There was one false positive diagnosis of recurrence by EUS because of postoperative fibrosis resulting in concentric hypertrophy of the esophageal wall near the surgical anastomosis. Of the 10 symptomatic patients, 4 were diagnosed with tumor recurrence. EUS correctly predicted recurrences in all symptomatic patients (100% sensitivity and specificity), as did upper endoscopy with biopsy. Conclusions: EUS is more sensitive than upper endoscopy and CT scan for the evaluation of anastomotic recurrence of esophageal carcinoma and should be considered as an adjunctive modality to conventional endoscopy for the postoperative surveillance of these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 544
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ALLUM WH, 1984, CLIN ONCOL, V10, P333
[2]   ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN ESOPHAGEAL DISEASES [J].
DANCYGIER, H ;
CLASSEN, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (03) :220-225
[3]  
ELLIS FH, 1985, CAN J SURG, V28, P493
[4]   IS SECOND LOOK SURGERY JUSTIFIED IN SUSPECTED RECURRENCES OF CANCER OF STOMACH [J].
ELLIS, H ;
JAYASEKARA, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1975, 62 (03) :226-230
[5]  
GALOUDIUK S, 1986, ANN SURG, V203, P101
[6]   THE VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - RESULTS OF A STUDY OF THE EORTC [J].
GIGNOUX, M ;
ROUSSEL, A ;
PAILLOT, B ;
GILLET, M ;
SCHLAG, P ;
FAVRE, JP ;
DALESIO, O ;
BUYSE, M ;
DUEZ, N .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 11 (04) :426-432
[7]  
GRIFFITH JL, 1980, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V79, P447
[8]   ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE STOMACH - AREAS OF FAILURE IN A REOPERATION SERIES (2ND OR SYMPTOMATIC LOOK) CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ADJUVANT THERAPY [J].
GUNDERSON, LL ;
SOSIN, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (01) :1-11
[9]  
HALVORSEN RA, 1984, SEMIN ONCOL, V11, P113
[10]  
Kasai M, 1978, World J Surg, V2, P543