ON THE HIGH PREDICTIVE POTENTIAL OF CHANGE AND GROWTH MEASURES

[1] HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE CHANGE - OR SHOULD WE [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 74 (01) : 68 - 80

[2] Davis F.B., 1964, ED MEASUREMENTS THEI

[3] Gulliksen H., 1950, THEORY MENTAL TESTS

[4] DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF CHANGE BETWEEN PRE-TESTING AND POST-TESTING PERIODS [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1977, 47 (01) : 121 - 150

[5] Lord F. M., 1963, PROBLEMS MEASURING C

[6] Mehrens W., 1973, MEASUREMENT EVALUATI

[7] OCONNOR EF, 1972, REV EDUC RES, V42, P73

[8] Popham W. J., 1978, CRITERION REFERENCED

[9] RICHARDS JM, 1975, AM EDUC RES J, V12, P299

[10] Stanley J. C., 1971, ED MEASUREMENT

[1] HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE CHANGE - OR SHOULD WE [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 74 (01) : 68 - 80

[2] Davis F.B., 1964, ED MEASUREMENTS THEI

[3] Gulliksen H., 1950, THEORY MENTAL TESTS

[4] DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF CHANGE BETWEEN PRE-TESTING AND POST-TESTING PERIODS [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1977, 47 (01) : 121 - 150

[5] Lord F. M., 1963, PROBLEMS MEASURING C

[6] Mehrens W., 1973, MEASUREMENT EVALUATI

[7] OCONNOR EF, 1972, REV EDUC RES, V42, P73

[8] Popham W. J., 1978, CRITERION REFERENCED

[9] RICHARDS JM, 1975, AM EDUC RES J, V12, P299

[10] Stanley J. C., 1971, ED MEASUREMENT