Effect of donor age and sex on the outcome of liver transplantation

被引:111
作者
Marino, IR
Doyle, HR
Aldrighetti, L
Doria, C
McMichael, J
Gayowski, T
Fung, JJ
Tzakis, AG
Starzl, TE
机构
[1] VET ADM MED CTR,PITTSBURGH,PA
[2] UNIV MIAMI,DIV TRANSPLANTAT,MIAMI,FL 33152
关键词
D O I
10.1002/hep.1840220622
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We correlated donor and recipient factors with graft outcome in 436 adult patients who underwent 462 liver transplants. Donor variables analyzed were age, gender, ABO blood group, cause of death, length of stay in the intensive care unit, use of pressors or pitressin, need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, terminal serum transaminases, and ischemia time. Recipient variables analyzed were age, gender, primary diagnosis, history of previous liver transplant, ABO blood group, cytotoxic antibody crossmatch, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, and waiting time (except for the cross-match results, they were all known at the time of the operation). The endpoint of the analysis was graft failure, defined as patient death or retransplantation. Using multivariate analysis, graft failure was significantly associated with donor age, donor gender, previous liver transplantation, and UNOS 4 status of the recipient. The effect of donor age became evident only when they were older than 45 years. Livers horn female donors yielded significantly poorer results, with a-year graft survival of female to male 55% (95% CI, 45% to 67%); female to female, 64% (95% CI, 54% to 77%); male to male, 72% (95% CI, 66% to 78%); and male to female, 78% (95% CI, 70% to 88%). The only donors identified as questionable for liver procurement were old (greater than or equal to 60 years) women in whom the adverse age and gender factors were at least additive. However, rather than discard even these livers, in the face of an organ shortage crisis, their individualized use is suggested with case reporting in a special category.
引用
收藏
页码:1754 / 1762
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ADAM R, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V23, P2602
[2]   THE USE OF MARGINAL DONORS FOR ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION - THE INFLUENCE OF DONOR AGE ON OUTCOME [J].
ALEXANDER, JW ;
VAUGHN, WK .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 51 (01) :135-141
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, STAT METHODS S
[4]   APPLICATION OF REDUCED-SIZE LIVER-TRANSPLANTS AS SPLIT GRAFTS, AUXILIARY ORTHOTOPIC GRAFTS, AND LIVING RELATED SEGMENTAL TRANSPLANTS [J].
BROELSCH, CE ;
EMOND, JC ;
WHITINGTON, PF ;
THISTLETHWAITE, JR ;
BAKER, AL ;
LICHTOR, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 212 (03) :368-377
[5]  
BUCKEL E, 1993, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P1558
[6]   AGE CHANGES IN GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE, EFFECTIVE RENAL PLASMA FLOW, AND TUBULAR EXCRETORY CAPACITY IN ADULT MALES [J].
DAVIES, DF ;
SHOCK, NW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1950, 29 (05) :496-507
[7]   EARLY DEATH OR RETRANSPLANTATION IN ADULTS AFTER ORTHOTOPIC LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION - CAN OUTCOME BE PREDICTED [J].
DOYLE, HR ;
MARINO, IR ;
JABBOUR, N ;
ZETTI, G ;
MCMICHAEL, J ;
MITCHELL, S ;
FUNG, J ;
STARZL, TE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 57 (07) :1028-1036
[8]  
EGHTESAD B, 1994, HEPATOLOGY, V20, pS56, DOI 10.1002/hep.1840200713
[9]   NO EFFECT OF H-Y MINOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN IN ZERO-MISMATCHED LIVING-DONOR RENAL-TRANSPLANTS [J].
ELLISON, MD ;
NORMAN, DJ ;
BREEN, TJ ;
EDWARDS, EB ;
DAVIES, DB ;
DAILY, OP .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 58 (04) :518-520
[10]  
ERICZON BG, 1987, TRANSPLANT P, V19, P3862