PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN THE CANCER CONSULTATION - EVALUATION OF A QUESTION PROMPT SHEET

被引:181
作者
BUTOW, PN
DUNN, SM
TATTERSALL, MHN
JONES, QJ
机构
[1] ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSP,DEPT PSYCHIAT,MED PSYCHOL UNIT,SYDNEY,NSW,AUSTRALIA
[2] ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSP,DEPT ENDOCRINOL,SYDNEY,NSW,AUSTRALIA
[3] ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSP,DEPT CANC MED,SYDNEY,NSW,AUSTRALIA
[4] UNIV SYDNEY,DEPT CANC MED,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA
关键词
CANCER CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058793
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Active participation and asking questions are important ways in which patients can ensure they understand what the doctor has said. This study evaluated a question prompt sheet designed to encourage patients to ask questions in the cancer consultation. Patients and methods: Patients (n = 142) were randomised to receive (i) a question prompt sheet or (ii) a general sheet informing patients of services available through the regional Cancer Council. Recall of information was assessed in a structured interview 4-20 days after the consultation. Questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction and adjustment to cancer were sent by mail. Results: The question prompt sheet had a significant effect in one content area: prognosis. Thirty-five percent of patients who received the question handout asked questions about prognosis compared to 16% of those receiving the information handout. The prompt sheet did not increase the mean number of questions asked overall. Age, in/out-patient status, gender and involvement preference were predictive of both number and duration of patient questions. Conclusions: A question prompt sheet has a limited but important effect on patient question asking behaviour in the cancer consultation.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 204
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Bales R., 1950, AM SOCIOL REV
[2]  
BOREHAM P, 1978, SOC SCI MED-MED SOC, V12, P409
[3]   PHYSICIANS COMMUNICATION STYLE AND PATIENT SATISFACTION [J].
BULLER, MK ;
BULLER, DB .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1987, 28 (04) :375-388
[4]   ON THE RECEIVING END .4. VALIDATION OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE INDICATORS [J].
BUTOW, P ;
COATES, A ;
DUNN, S ;
BERNHARD, J ;
HURNY, C .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1991, 2 (08) :597-603
[5]   INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) :832-836
[6]  
Cohen F., 1979, HLTH PSYCHOL HDB, P217
[7]   GENERAL INFORMATION TAPES INHIBIT RECALL OF THE CANCER CONSULTATION [J].
DUNN, SM ;
BUTOW, PN ;
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
JONES, QJ ;
SHELDON, JS ;
TAYLOR, JJ ;
SUMICH, MD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (11) :2279-2285
[8]   CANCER BY ANOTHER NAME - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE EFFECTS OF EUPHEMISM AND UNCERTAINTY IN COMMUNICATING WITH CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
DUNN, SM ;
PATTERSON, PU ;
BUTOW, PN ;
SMARTT, HH ;
MCCARTHY, WH ;
TATTERSALL, MHN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (05) :989-996
[9]  
FRIEDSON E, 1972, PATIENTS PHYSICANS I
[10]  
Holsti O. R., 1969, CONTENT ANAL SOCIAL