MECHANICAL INFLUENCES ON TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION AT BONE-CEMENT INTERFACES

被引:50
作者
GIORI, NJ
RYD, L
CARTER, DR
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Lund, Lund
关键词
IMPLANT INTERFACE; DIFFERENTIATION; STRESS; MECHANICS; PRESSURE; CELL SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80154-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Retrieval studies have shown that tissue at the bone-cement or bone-implant interface can develop into fibrous tissue, fibrocartilage, and bone, and that tissue differentiation appears to be mechanically influenced. A prior histologic analysis of retrieved interface tissues supporting cemented Marmor unicondylar knee components found that beneath the central portion of these implants, a thick, mature layer of fibrocartilage consistently developed, whereas fibrous tissue formed beneath the prosthesis periphery and adjacent to the bone beneath the tibial spine. Finite-element analysis was used to model the interface tissue supporting a cemented Marmor tibial component and interpreted patterns of stress and strain generated in the interface according to a mechanically based tissue differentiation theory. Distortional strain and hydrostatic stress, mechanical stimuli that are hypothesized to be associated with fibrous matrix and cartilaginous matrix production, respectively, were found to correlate well with the previous histologic findings. Given the biologic environments in which the retrieved interface tissues developed, frequently applied hydrostatic stress of approximately 0.7 MPa may be sufficient to stimulate cartilaginous extracellular matrix production in the interface tissue, and frequently applied distortional strain of 10% may be sufficient to stimulate fibrous extracellular matrix production.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 522
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Albrektsson, Branemark, Hansson, Lindstrom, Osseointegrated titanium implants, Acta Orthop Scand, 52, (1981)
  • [2] Charnley, Crawford, Histology of bone in contact with self-curing acrylic cement, J Bone Joint Surg, 50 B, (1968)
  • [3] Cook, Thomas, Haddad, Histologic analysis of retrieved human porous-coated total joint components, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 234, (1988)
  • [4] Freeman, Bradley, Revell, Observations upon the interface between bone and polymethylmethacrylate cement, J Bone Joint Surg, 64 B, (1982)
  • [5] Vernon-Roberts, Freeman, The tissue response to total joint replacement prostheses, The scientific basis of joint replacements, (1977)
  • [6] Feith, Side effects of acrylic cement implanted into bone, Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 161, (1975)
  • [7] Willert, Ludwig, Semtlisch, Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg, 56 A, (1974)
  • [8] Hayashi, Inoue, Tissue reaction around loosened prostheses: a histological, X-ray microanalytic and immunological study, Acta Med Okayama, 40, (1986)
  • [9] Johanson, Bullough, Wilson, Et al., The microscopic anatomy of the bone—cement interface in failed total hip arthroplasties, Clin Orthop, 218, (1987)
  • [10] Goldring, Schiller, Roelke, Et al., The synovial-like membrane at the bone—cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis, J Bone Joint Surg, 65 A, (1983)