Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial Comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to Anterior Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease in the Cervical Spine

被引:98
作者
Hisey, Michael S. [1 ]
Bae, Hyun W. [2 ]
Davis, Reginald [3 ]
Gaede, Steven [4 ]
Hoffman, Greg [5 ]
Kim, Kee [6 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [7 ]
Peterson, Daniel [8 ]
Rashbaum, Ralph [9 ]
Stokes, John [8 ]
机构
[1] Texas Back Inst, 2817 South Mayhill Rd,Suite 100, Denton, TX 76208 USA
[2] St Johns Hlth Ctr, Spine Inst, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] GBMC Healthcare Greater Baltimore Neurosurg Assoc, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Oklahoma Spine & Brain Inst, Tulsa, OK USA
[5] Orthoped North East, Ft Wayne, IN USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[7] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA USA
[8] Neurol Specialists Austin, Austin, TX USA
[9] Texas Back Inst, Plano, TX USA
关键词
clinical outcome; randomized study; anterior cervical fusion; Cervical Spine; total disc replacement;
D O I
10.14444/1007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard for treating symptomatic cervical disc degeneration. Cervical total disc replacements (TDRs) have emerged as an alternative for some patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new TDR device compared with ACDF for treating singlelevel cervical disc degeneration. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study. A total of 245 patients were treated (164 TDR: 81 ACDF). The primary outcome measure was overall success based on improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI), no subsequent surgical interventions, and no adverse events (AEs) classified as major complications. Secondary outcome measures included SF-12, visual analog scale (VAS) assessing neck and arm pain, patient satisfaction, radiographic range of motion, and adjacent level degeneration. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The hypothesis was that the TDR success rate was non-inferior to ACDF at 24 months. Results Overall success rates were 73.6% for TDR and 65.3% for ACDF, confirming noninferiority (p < 0.0025). TDR demonstrated earlier improvements with significant differences in NDI scores at 6 weeks and 3 months, and VAS neck pain and SF-12 PCS scores at 6 weeks (p<0.05). Operative level range of motion in the TDR group was maintained throughout follow-up. Radiographic evidence of inferior adjacent segment degeneration was significantly greater with ACDF at 12 and 24 months (p < 0.05). AE rates were similar. Conclusions Mobi-C TDR is a safe and effective treatment for single-level disc degeneration, producing outcomes similar to ACDF with less adjacent segment degeneration.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C®) with up to 2 years of follow-up [J].
Beaurain, J. ;
Bernard, P. ;
Dufour, T. ;
Fuentes, J. M. ;
Hovorka, I. ;
Huppert, J. ;
Steib, J. P. ;
Vital, J. M. ;
Aubourg, L. ;
Vila, T. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (06) :841-850
[2]
Reoperations in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Anterior Cervical Fusion Results Compiled From Multiple Prospective Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Trials Conducted at a Single Site [J].
Blumenthal, Scott L. ;
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. ;
Guyer, Richard D. ;
Zigler, Jack E. .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (14) :1177-1182
[3]
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein [J].
Boakye, M ;
Mummaneni, PV ;
Garrett, M ;
Rodts, G ;
Haid, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (05) :521-525
[4]
ROBINSON ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND ARTHRODESIS FOR CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF 100 AND 22 PATIENTS [J].
BOHLMAN, HH ;
EMERY, SE ;
GOODFELLOW, DB ;
JONES, PK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09) :1298-1307
[5]
MODIFIED SMITH-ROBINSON PROCEDURE FOR ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION [J].
BRODKE, DS ;
ZDEBLICK, TA .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (10) :S427-S430
[6]
CERVICAL STABILIZATION BY PLATE AND BONE FUSION [J].
BROWN, JA ;
HAVEL, P ;
EBRAHEIM, N ;
GREENBLATT, SH ;
JACKSON, WT .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (03) :236-240
[7]
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article [J].
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Haid, Regis W., Jr. ;
Traynelis, Vincent C. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (03) :308-318
[8]
Artificial Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Systematic Review [J].
Cepoiu-Martin, Monica ;
Faris, Peter ;
Lorenzetti, Diane ;
Prefontaine, Eliza ;
Noseworthy, Tom ;
Sutherland, Lloyd .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (25) :E1623-E1633
[9]
Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site Presented at the 2012 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article [J].
Coric, Domagoj ;
Kim, Paul K. ;
Clemente, Jonathan D. ;
Boltes, Margaret O. ;
Nussbaum, Marcy ;
James, Sara .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (01) :36-42
[10]
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the KineflexIC artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up Clinical article [J].
Coric, Domagoj ;
Nunley, Pierce D. ;
Guyer, Richard D. ;
Musante, David ;
Carmody, Cameron N. ;
Gordon, Charles R. ;
Lauryssen, Carl ;
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. ;
Boltes, Margaret O. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (04) :348-358