INFLUENCE OF SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION ON CONSOLIDATION OF POSTEROLATERAL LUMBOSACRAL FUSION - A ROENTGEN STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRIC AND RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

被引:63
作者
JOHNSSON, R
STROMQVIST, B
AXELSSON, P
SELVIK, G
机构
[1] Departments of Orthopedics and Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund
关键词
POSTEROLATERAL LUMBOSACRAL FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE ORTHOTIC IMMOBILIZATION; ROENTGEN STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRIC ANALYSIS; INTERVERTEBRAL TRANSLATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199201000-00003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To determine the influence of the duration of postoperative lumbar immobilization with the aid of a rigid lumbar orthosis on the consolidation of posterolateral lumbosacral fusions, 22 patients with no previous osseous spinal surgery and with fusion without osteosynthesis due to spondylolysis-olisthesis Grade 1 to 2 or intervertebral disc or facet joint disorder were examined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis in supine and erect positions and by conventional radiography for 1 year after surgery. In Series 1, patients (n = 11) were instructed to keep the trunk straight with the aid of a molded, rigid lumbar orthosis for 5 months after surgery; and in Series 2 (n = 11), the same instructions were given, but for 3 months. In Series 1, osseous fusion was seen on radiographs in eight patients. In these patients, the intervertebral translations between the fused vertebrae began to decrease 3-6 months after surgery, and within 1 year, the fusions became rigid, as defined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis, or intervertebral translations of mostly less than 1 mm persisted. In three patients with poor fusion still seen on radiographs 1 year after surgery, no rigid fusion was obtained and intervertebral translations of up to 10 mm persisted. In Series 2, a similar roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis pattern was noted in two patients with osseous fusion and in seven with poor fusion seen on radiographs. The fusion was radiographically doubtful in two patients. In these patients, the intervertebral translations decreased, but translations of 1.5 mm persisted 1 year after surgery. The rate of fusion healing according to roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis or radiography was significantly higher (P < 0.05, Fisher exact test) in Series 1 than in Series 2. This seems consistent with the roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis finding of rather late onset (3-6 months after surgery) of decreasing translatory mobility between the fused vertebrae in successful fusions. The study illustrates the value of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis in prospective comparative studies of spinal disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 21
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bitan F., Bex M., Lassale B., Et al., Facteurs de reussitc dc l'arthrodesc postero-Iaterale du rachis lombo-sacre, Rev Chir Orthop, 70, pp. 465-471, (1984)
[2]  
Boucher H.H., A method of spine fusion, J Bone Joint Surg, 41B, pp. 248-259, (1959)
[3]  
Crock H.V., Anterior lumbar interbody fusion-Indications of ils use and notes on surgical technique, Clin Orthop, 165, pp. 157-163, (1982)
[4]  
Dennis S., Watkins R., Landaker S., Dillin W., Springer D., Comparison of disc space heights after anterior lumbar intcrbody fusion, Spine, 14, pp. 876-878, (1989)
[5]  
Farfan H.F., Mechanical Disorders of the Low Back, pp. 42-61, (1973)
[6]  
Flynn J.C., Price C.T., Sexual complications of anterior fusion of the lumbar spine, Spine, 9, pp. 489-491, (1984)
[7]  
Hcnstorf J.E., Gaines R.W., Steffcc A.D., Transpedicular fixation of spinal disorders with Steffee plates, Surg Rounds Orthop March, (1987)
[8]  
Jackson R.K., Boston D.A., Edge A.J., Lateral mass fusion: A prospective study of a consecutive scries with long-term follow-up, Spine, 10, pp. 828-832, (1985)
[9]  
Jacobs R.R., Montcsano P.X., Jackson R.P., Enhancement of lumbar spine fusion by use of translaminar facet joint screws, Spine, 14, pp. 12-15, (1989)
[10]  
Johnsson R., Selvik O., Stromqvist B., Sundcn G., Mobility of the lower lumbar spine after posterolateral fusion determined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis, Spine, 15, pp. 347-350, (1990)