MODEL COMPARISON OF UNSATURATED STEADY-STATE SOLUTE TRANSPORT IN A FIELD PLOT

被引:21
作者
COSTA, JL
KNIGHTON, RE
PRUNTY, L
机构
[1] INTA,EXPTL AGROPECUARIA ESTAC,BALCARCE,ARGENTINA
[2] N DAKOTA STATE UNIV,DEPT SOIL SCI,FARGO,ND 58105
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050001x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Models of solute movement in soil are seldom compared using independently generated data. The objectives of this study were to leach Br- through a Hecla fine sandy loam (sandy, mixed Aquic Haploboroll) and to compare the results with four previously published solute transport models. Solute was applied over the surface of four 9-m(2) subplots within a 65.5-m(2) plot and leached at constant rates: 1.28, 2.53, 4.28, and 5.94 mu m s(-1). Soil solution samples were taken from 0.3-, 0.6-, 1.0-, 1.5-, 2.0-, 2.3-, and 2.5-m depths. At the same depths, water content and soil suction were measured using a neutron probe and tensiometers. Data from this experiment were used to evaluate four solute transport models. Model performance was evaluated using the observed to expected sum-of-squares ratio, the normalized objective function, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. A numerical finite-difference solution of the convective-dispersive equation (LEACHM) was more successful in predicting solute movement under unsaturated steady-state conditions than the analytical solution for the convective-dispersive equation (CDE), the continuous-time Markov process (CTMP), or the transfer function model (TFM). The CTMP model predicts observed solute concentration better than the TFM. The TFM needs to be calibrated by a solute transport experiment while CTMP requires water flow and soil moisture as input data.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1287
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   CONCEPTS OF SOLUTE LEACHING IN SOILS - A REVIEW OF MODELING APPROACHES [J].
ADDISCOTT, TM ;
WAGENET, RJ .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1985, 36 (03) :411-424
[2]  
ADRIANO DC, 1982, AGRONOMY, V9, P449
[3]   SOIL SOLUTE CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTIONS FOR SPATIALLY VARYING PORE WATER VELOCITIES AND APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENTS [J].
AMOOZEGARFARD, A ;
NIELSEN, DR ;
WARRICK, AW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (01) :3-9
[4]   TRANSPORT OF CONSERVATIVE TRACERS IN THE FIELD UNDER INTERMITTENT FLOOD IRRIGATION [J].
BOWMAN, RS ;
RICE, RC .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (11) :1531-1536
[5]   SOLUTE-DISPERSION IN UNSATURATED HETEROGENEOUS SOIL AT FIELD SCALE .2. APPLICATIONS [J].
BRESLER, E ;
DAGAN, G .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1979, 43 (03) :467-472
[6]   UNSATURATED FLOW IN SPATIALLY-VARIABLE FIELDS .2. APPLICATION OF WATER-FLOW MODELS TO VARIOUS FIELDS [J].
BRESLER, E ;
DAGAN, G .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1983, 19 (02) :421-428
[7]   FIELD SCALE TRANSPORT OF BROMIDE IN AN UNSATURATED SOIL .1. EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS [J].
BUTTERS, GL ;
JURY, WA ;
ERNST, FF .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1989, 25 (07) :1575-1581
[8]   COMPARATIVE RATES OF LEACHING OF CHLORIDE, NITRATE AND TRITIATED-WATER UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS [J].
CAMERON, KC ;
WILD, A .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1982, 33 (04) :649-657
[9]  
Conover W.J., 1999, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET, P428, DOI DOI 10.1002/BIMJ.19730150311
[10]  
COSTA JL, 1991, THESIS N DAKOTA STAT