THE EFFECT OF MATERNAL OBESITY ON THE ACCURACY OF FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION

被引:74
作者
FIELD, NT [1 ]
PIPER, JM [1 ]
LANGER, O [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,SAN ANTONIO,TX 78284
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0029-7844(95)00096-A
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if maternal obesity affects the accuracy of either clinical or sonographic fetal weight estimations. Methods: In a year-long study, 998 singleton pregnancies of 26-43 weeks' gestation underwent both clinical (Leopold) and sonographic (Shepard and Hadlock) fetal weight estimation within 5 days of delivery (mean 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.3). Patients were stratified into four different groups based on increasing maternal body mass index (BMI): underweight (less than 19.8), nounal weight (19.8-26.0), overweight (26.1-29.0), and obese (more than 29.0). The various estimations of fetal weight were compared with actual birth weight, and the mean absolute percent error was calculated for each specific method and analyzed among the four BMI groups. Results: For each method of weight estimation, there was no difference (specifically, no increase) in the magnitude of the absolute percent error with increasing maternal obesity. Regardless of maternal size, almost half of the weight predictions were within 5% of the actual birth weight. Conclusion: Increasing maternal obesity does not alter or decrease the accuracy of either clinical or sonographic fetal weight estimations. Therefore, fetal weight predictions provide equally accurate and valid guidelines for determining management decisions in women, regardless of body size.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   SONOGRAPHICALLY ESTIMATED FETAL WEIGHTS - ACCURACY AND LIMITATION [J].
BENACERRAF, BR ;
GELMAN, R ;
FRIGOLETTO, FD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 159 (05) :1118-1121
[2]   2ND-TRIMESTER ULTRASONOGRAPHY - DETERMINANTS OF VISUALIZATION OF FETAL ANATOMIC STRUCTURES [J].
CATANZARITE, V ;
QUIRK, JG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (04) :1191-1195
[3]  
CHAUHAN SP, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P523
[4]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
SHARMAN, RS ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) :333-337
[5]   SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT - THE VALUE OF FEMUR LENGTH IN ADDITION TO HEAD AND ABDOMEN MEASUREMENTS [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
CARPENTER, RJ ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 150 (02) :535-540
[6]  
KEEN C, 1993, MATERNAL NUTRITION P, P293
[7]   INDEXES OF RELATIVE WEIGHT AND OBESITY [J].
KEYS, A ;
KARVONEN, MJ ;
KIMURA, N ;
FIDANZA, F ;
TAYLOR, HL .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1972, 25 (6-7) :329-&
[8]  
LEVINE AB, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P55
[9]   RELIABILITY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC FORMULARY IN THE PREDICTION OF FETAL WEIGHT AND SURVIVAL OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS [J].
MILLS, MD ;
NAGEOTTE, MP ;
ELLIOTT, JP ;
CRADE, M ;
DORCHESTER, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (05) :1568-1574
[10]  
PATTERSON RM, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P330