THE JOB DESCRIPTIVE INDEX REVISITED - QUESTIONS ABOUT THE QUESTION MARK

被引:64
作者
HANISCH, KA
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.377
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The scoring of the ? response option for items in the Work scale of the Job Descriptive Index (JDI; Smith, Kendall, & Hulin, 1969) was investigated. The scale was administered to 548 individuals at a large university. Analyses similar to those completed by Smith et al. and polychotomous item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted. The results obtained with Smith et al.'s procedure confirmed that the ? option should be scored as a more negative than positive response for the overall scale. Work satisfaction items that did not discriminate between satisfied and dissatisfied individuals were identified from the latent trait analyses. Using IRT to evaluate such item response options as neutral and no opinion is discussed. Results from items in the Co-Workers and Pay scales of the JDI and the Health and Retirement Valence scales of the Retirement Descriptive Index (Smith et al., 1969) are described.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 382
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BOCK RD, 1972, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V37, P29
[2]  
DRASGOW F, 1990, HDB IND ORG PSYCHOL, P577
[3]   JOB-ATTITUDES AND ORGANIZATIONAL WITHDRAWAL - AN EXAMINATION OF RETIREMENT AND OTHER VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL BEHAVIORS [J].
HANISCH, KA ;
HULIN, CL .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1990, 37 (01) :60-78
[4]   GENERAL ATTITUDES AND ORGANIZATIONAL WITHDRAWAL - AN EVALUATION OF A CAUSAL MODEL [J].
HANISCH, KA ;
HULIN, CL .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1991, 39 (01) :110-128
[5]   RESPONSE FORMAT OF THE JOB DESCRIPTIVE INDEX - ASSESSMENT OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
JOHNSON, SM ;
SMITH, PC ;
TUCKER, SM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 67 (04) :500-505
[7]  
Smith PC., 1969, MEASUREMENT SATISFAC
[8]  
THISSEN D, 1988, MULTILOG MULTIPLE CA
[9]   DIMENSIONALITY OF THE JOB DESCRIPTIVE INDEX [J].
YEAGER, SJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1981, 24 (01) :205-212