CHLORPYRIFOS-METHYL PLUS EITHER METHOPRENE OR SYNERGIZED PHENOTHRIN FOR CONTROL OF COLEOPTERA IN MAIZE IN QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA

被引:29
作者
DAGLISH, GJ
EELKEMA, M
HARRISON, LM
机构
[1] Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, QLD 4068, Meiers Road, Indooroopilly
关键词
CHLORPYRIFOS-METHYL; METHOPRENE; SYNERGIZED PHENOTHRIN; COLEOPTERA; STORED MAIZE; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1016/0022-474X(95)00014-X
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Silo-scale field trials of chlorpyrifos-methyl (10 mg kg(-1)) + methoprene (1 mg kg(-1)) and chlorpyrifos-methyl (10 mg kg(-1)) + phenothrin (1 mg kg(-1)) + piperonyl butoxide (8.5 mg kg(-1)) were carried out on maize in north Queensland, Australia. Although these treatments are known to be effective against insects in wheat stored under Australian conditions, they have not been assessed on maize. Samples of maize were taken from 1 m below the grain surface at various times during storage to check for infestations, and to use in bioassays and residue analyses. The bioassays used resistant strains of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, S. oryzae (L.), Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.). The study confirmed that chlorpyrifos-methyl + methoprene and chlorpyrifos-methyl + synergized phenothrin were highly effective against the major grain beetles for at least 7 months. Both treatments gave good control of beetles in laboratory bioassays, and no infestations were detected in the silos despite the presence of beetles before treatment. The study also shows that methroprene would be an effective alternative to synthetic pyrethroids for control of R. dominica, and could be used in a rotation program as part of a resistance management strategy. Further study is required on the efficacy of protectants against the moth Ephestia cautella Walker, because infestations developed on the grain surface in each treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Recommended methods for the detection and measurement of resistance of agricultural pests to pesticides. Tentative method for adults of some major beetle pests of stored cereals with malathion or lindane—FAO Method No. 15, FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, pp. 127-137, (1974)
  • [2] Arthur, Throne, Simonnaitis, Zehner, Evaluation of chlorpyrifos-methyl and chlorpyrifos-methyl plus methoprene as protectants of stored corn: small bin tests, Journal of Economic Entomology, 83, pp. 1114-1121, (1990)
  • [3] Bengston, Insect growth regulators, Proceedings of the 4th International Working Conference on Stored-product Protection, pp. 35-46, (1987)
  • [4] Bengston, Strange, Recent developments in grain protectants for use in Australia, Proceedings of the 6th International Working Conference on Stored-product Protection, pp. 751-754, (1994)
  • [5] Bengston, Connell, Davies, Desmarchelier, Elder, Hart, Phillips, Ridley, Ripp, Snelson, Sticka, Chlorpyrifos-methyl plus bioresmethrin
  • [6] methacrifos
  • [7] pirimiphos-methyl plus bioresmethrin
  • [8] and synergised bioresmethrin as grain protectants for wheat, Pesticide Science, 11, pp. 61-76, (1980)
  • [9] Bengston, Cooper, Davies, Desmarchelier, Hart, Phillips, Grain protectants for the control of malathion-resistant insects in stored sorghum, Pesticide Science, 14, pp. 385-398, (1983)
  • [10] Bengston, Davies, Desmarchelier, Henning, Murray, Simpson, Snelson, Sticka, Wallbank, Organophosphorothioates and synergised synthetic pyrethroids as grain protectants on bulk wheat, Pesticide Science, 14, pp. 373-384, (1983)