DOSE-INTENSITY METAANALYSIS OF CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN SMALL-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG

被引:121
作者
KLASA, RJ
MURRAY, N
COLDMAN, AJ
机构
[1] CANC CONTROL AGCY,DIV EPIDEMIOL,VANCOUVER V5Z 3J3,BC,CANADA
[2] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,VANCOUVER V6T 1W5,BC,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.499
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To determine if chemotherapy dose intensity (DI) influences treatment outcome, 60 published studies in limited- and extensive-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were retrospectively analyzed for relationship between intended Dl and response (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) or median survival (MS). Agents used in the regimens included cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (A), vincristine (V), etoposide (E), and cisplatin (P). Relative DI (RDI) of each study regimen was calculated against a reference regimen, and weighted regression analysis was used. Additionally, analysis of individual drug RDI within combinations was performed. For CAV, increasing RDI of the regimen showed no correlation with outcome. For the individual drugs, C RDI correlated positively, while A RDI correlated negatively with attainment of CR in limited disease, but both only after unduly influential observations were eliminated. In extensive-stage disease, A RDI correlated positively with CR +, PR but only in randomized trials, and this correlation lost statistical significance after unduly influential observations were eliminated. For CAE and CAVE, the RDI of the regimens correlated positively with MS in extensive-stage disease as did the C RDI. In limited disease, the C RDI correlated negatively with MS. For EP, no significant correlations were seen. We conclude that DI-outcome correlations are not consistent for these chemotherapy regimens in SCCL. Meta-analysis of retrospective data can generate hypotheses for testing in prospective clinical trials, but study sample and method of analysis can appreciably affect conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 508
页数:10
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] ABELOFF MD, 1981, CANCER TREAT REP, V65, P639
  • [2] AISNER J, 1986, SEMIN ONCOL, V13, P54
  • [3] AISNER J, 1982, CANCER TREAT REP, V66, P221
  • [4] AISNER J, 1980, CANCER, V46, P2543, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12<2543::AID-CNCR2820461202>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-4
  • [6] AISNER J, 1985, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V4, P181
  • [7] AISNER J, 1983, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V2, P196
  • [8] ARMITAGE P, 1988, STATISTICAL METHODS
  • [9] Atkinson A. C, 1985, PLOTS TRANSFORMATION
  • [10] BATIST G, 1984, P AM ASSOC CANC RES, V25, P175