Rivalry under price and quantity uncertainty

被引:28
作者
Paxson, Dean [1 ]
Pinto, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Business Sch, Booth St West, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
关键词
Real options; Pre-emption; Stochastic processes; Competitive games;
D O I
10.1016/j.rfe.2005.04.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We present a real option model for a duopoly setting where there are two stochastic factors and where the roles of the players are defined both exogenously and endogenously. The two stochastic factors are the number of units (market volume) and the profit per unit, which may have significantly different drifts and volatilities, and different correlations, depending on market structure and (dis) economies of scale. The paper shows that the degree of correlation between unit profits and market volume might result in different value functions and triggers, especially for followers and simultaneous investors in non-pre-emptive games. Monopoly-like volume is a critical determinant of the leader's trigger in both pre-emptive and non-pre-emptive games. First-mover advantages are significant in the definition of the leader's optimal entry moment, if the players are fighting for the leader's position (pre-emptive game). (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 224
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Cournot A.A., 1838, RES MATH PRINCIPLES
[2]  
Dixit R. K., 2012, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400830176
[3]  
Dutta P., 1999, STRATEGIES GAMES THE
[4]   PREEMPTION AND RENT EQUALIZATION IN THE ADOPTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY [J].
FUDENBERG, D ;
TIROLE, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1985, 52 (03) :383-401
[5]  
Fudenberg D, 1991, GAME THEORY
[6]   The strategic exercise of options: Development cascades and overbuilding in real estate markets [J].
Grenadier, SR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (05) :1653-1679
[7]   Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncertainty [J].
Hoppe, HC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 18 (02) :315-338
[8]  
Howell S., 2001, REAL OPTIONS EVALUAT
[9]  
Huisman K., 1999, EFFECTS STRATEGIC IN
[10]  
Huisman K., 2001, TECHNOLOGY INVESTMEN