SEX-DIFFERENCES IN PATIENT RECOVERY PATTERNS AFTER CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY

被引:47
作者
ARTINIAN, NT [1 ]
DUGGAN, CH [1 ]
机构
[1] WAYNE STATE UNIV,COLL NURSING,DETROIT,MI 48202
来源
HEART & LUNG | 1995年 / 24卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0147-9563(95)80026-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe sex differences in physical, psychologic, and social recovery patterns after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS). Design: Repeated measures between groups (men versus women) design. Data were collected before discharge from the hospital and at 1, 3, and 6 weeks after discharge. Setting: Five teaching hospitals: one urban, three suburban, and one midstate hospital that serves rural and urban clients. Sample: The initial sample consisted of 187 men and 70 women; 132 men and 47 women completed the study. Outcome Measures: Physical recovery was assessed by three subscales of the Sickness Impact Profile-ambulation, sleep-rest, body care and movement; a Symptom Inventory, and a Cantril Ladder Scale. Psychologic recovery was measured by the Beck Depression Inventory, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and a Cantril Ladder Scale. Social recovery was measured by three subscales of the Sickness Impact Profile-home management, social interaction, and recreation and pastimes. Results: All measures indicated significant improvement over time with the exception of self-esteem and perception of mental health, which remained stable. There were significant differences between men and women on five recovery variables: ambulation dysfunction, physical symptoms, perceptions of physical health, symptoms of depression, and home management dysfunction. Conclusions: Though it is encouraging that both sex groups experienced significant improvement in recovery over time, men and women show same differences in recovery experiences that need to be considered when planning their care.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 494
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Penckofer, Holm, Women undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: physiological and psychosocial perspectives, Cardiovasc Nurs, 26, pp. 13-18, (1990)
[2]  
Lawrie, Morris, Earle, Long-term results of coronary bypass surgery, Ann Surg, 213, pp. 377-387, (1991)
[3]  
Kennedy, Kaiser, Fisher, Et al., Clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the collaborative study in coronary artery surgery (CASS), Circulation, 63, pp. 793-801, (1981)
[4]  
Foster, Reoperation for coronary artery disease, Circulation, 72, pp. V59-V64, (1985)
[5]  
Loop, Lytle, Cosgrove, Et al., Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events, N Engl J Med, 314, pp. 1-6, (1986)
[6]  
Lytle, Loop, Cosgrove, Ratliff, Easley, Longterm (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 89, pp. 248-258, (1985)
[7]  
Palac, Meadows, Hwang, Loeb, Pifarre, Gunnar, Risk factors related to progressive narrowing in aortocoronary vein grafts studied 1 and 5 years after surgery, Circulation, 66, pp. I40-I44, (1982)
[8]  
Rowe, Mullany, White, Wilson, Clarebrough, Early and late survival after coronary-artery surgery, Med J Aust, 150, pp. 682-693, (1989)
[9]  
Wenger, Gender, coronary artery disease, and coronary bypass surgery, Ann Intern Med, 112, pp. 557-558, (1990)
[10]  
Khan, Nessim, Gray, Czer, Chaux, Matloff, Increased mortality of women in coronary artery surgery: evidence for referral bias, Ann Intern Med, 112, pp. 561-567, (1990)