INTEGRATION OF BIOMATERIALS IMPLANTED INTO ABDOMINAL-WALL - PROCESS OF SCAR FORMATION AND MACROPHAGE RESPONSE

The behaviour of two biomaterials polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polypropylene (PL) has been studied, focussing especially on the macrophage response to the implant, as well as on certain aspects of the process of scar formation. A total of 24 animals (white New Zealand rabbits) received prostheses implanted into the anterior abdominal wall in such a way as to involve every layer over an area of 7 cm x 5 cm. The interfaces formed with the visceral peritoneum, subcutaneous tissue layer and the recipient muscle-aponeurotic tissue were assessed. The techniques employed were light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemical methods, the latter using a monoclonal antibody specific for rabbit macrophages (RAM-11). From the results obtained, it can be seen that: (a) the structure of PL allows its total integration with the reparative tissue, while PTFE becomes encapsulated, on both the subcutaneous and the peritoneal aspects, by orderly connective tissue; (b) the macrophage response, determined on the basis of the presence of labelled macrophages, shows a similar pattern in both biomaterials; and (c) angiogenesis is very intense in the PL mesh, whereas the PTFE prosthesis undergoes almost no vascular colonization.