AT THE MARGINS OF HUMANITY - FETAL POSITIONS IN SCIENCE AND MEDICINE

被引:27
作者
CASPER, MJ
机构
[1] University of California, San Francisco
关键词
D O I
10.1177/016224399401900303
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This article offers a comparative analysis of experimental fetal surgery and fetal tissue research. The author argues that fetuses are positioned differently across each set of practices, with significant implications for actors in these domains. By empirically charting the ways in which humanity is or is not attributed to fetal work objects, the author's argument challenges contemporary debates in science studies that tend to conceptualize human and nonhuman in dualistic terms. This analysis instead shows the heterogeneous attribution of these categories, as well as the spaces, margins, and positions, which constitute them as distinct.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 323
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   THE POLITICS OF TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN-FETAL TISSUE [J].
ANNAS, GJ ;
ELIAS, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (16) :1079-1082
[2]  
CALLON M, 1986, SOCIOL REV MONOGR, V32, P196
[3]  
CASPER MJ, 1993, M SOC SOCIAL STUDIES
[4]  
CASPER MJ, 1993, C NONHUMAN AGENCY CO
[5]   THE MANY FACES OF RU486 - TALES OF SITUATED KNOWLEDGES AND TECHNOLOGICAL CONTESTATIONS [J].
CLARKE, A ;
MONTINI, T .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1993, 18 (01) :42-78
[6]  
Clarke Adele E., 1987, PHYSL AM CONTEXT 185, P323
[7]   CONTROVERSY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES [J].
CLARKE, AE .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1990, 37 (01) :18-37
[8]  
Collins H.M., 1992, SCI PRACTICE CULTURE, P301
[9]   FUNDING RESTRICTIONS ON FETAL RESEARCH - THE IMPLICATIONS FOR SCIENCE AND HEALTH [J].
DONOVAN, P .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1990, 22 (05) :224-231
[10]  
DOWNEY GL, 1992, M AM ANTHR ASS SAN F