LATENCY OF MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS TO FOCAL TRANSCRANIAL STIMULATION VARIES AS A FUNCTION OF SCALP POSITIONS STIMULATED

被引:89
作者
FUHR, P
COHEN, LG
ROTH, BJ
HALLETT, M
机构
[1] NINCDS,MED NEUROL BRANCH,HUMAN MOTOR CONTROL SECT,BETHESDA,MD 20892
[2] NIH,DIV RES SERV,BIOMED ENGN & INSTRUMENTAT BRANCH,BETHESDA,MD 20892
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1991年 / 81卷 / 02期
关键词
MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS; CORTICAL STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX; CORTICOSPINAL TRACT; PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/0168-5597(91)90001-E
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial magnetic stimulation from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), biceps brachii and deltoid muscles at rest and during slight voluntary activation. An 8-shaped coil connected to a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator was positioned over different scalp positions 1 cm apart. At least 24 stimuli were delivered at each location. Latencies of MEPs were compared with those obtained by electrical and magnetic stimulation during muscle activation. Progressively longer MEP latencies were obtained in 5 groups depending on the type and position of stimulation. The shortest latencies were obtained with (1) electrical stimulation during muscle contraction and (2) non-focal magnetic stimulation during muscle contraction; magnetic stimulation at rest produced longer latencies with stimulation of (3) an optimal position, (4) a suboptimal position, and (5) a non-optimal position. Mean latency differences between successive groups were 1.9, 2.0, 1.6, and 2.6 msec for APB. Similar latency differences were found for the other arm muscles. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that the different latencies evoked by stimulation at different scalp locations are determined by the summation at spinal motoneurons of excitatory postsynaptic potentials generated by successive numbers of I waves.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 89
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] AMASSIAN V E, 1988, Neurology, V38, P197
  • [2] FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    AMASSIAN, VE
    CRACCO, RQ
    MACCABEE, PJ
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06): : 401 - 416
  • [3] BANDINELLI S, 1989, Neurology, V39, P415
  • [4] BARKER AT, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1325
  • [5] A METHOD OF MONITORING FUNCTION IN CORTICOSPINAL PATHWAYS DURING SCOLIOSIS SURGERY WITH A NOTE ON MOTOR CONDUCTION VELOCITIES
    BOYD, SG
    ROTHWELL, JC
    COWAN, JMA
    WEBB, PJ
    MORLEY, T
    ASSELMAN, P
    MARSDEN, CD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 49 (03) : 251 - 257
  • [6] DESTRUCTION OF PYRAMIDAL TRACT IN MAN
    BUCY, PC
    SIQUEIRA, EB
    KEPLINGER, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1964, 21 (05) : 385 - &
  • [7] MOTOR-UNIT RESPONSES IN HUMAN WRIST FLEXOR AND EXTENSOR MUSCLES TO TRANSCRANIAL CORTICAL STIMULI
    CALANCIE, B
    NORDIN, M
    WALLIN, U
    HAGBARTH, KE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 58 (05) : 1168 - 1185
  • [8] TOPOGRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF MUSCLES IN MOTOR CORTEX OF MONKEYS
    CHANG, HT
    RUCH, TC
    WARD, AA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1947, 10 (01) : 39 - 56
  • [9] COHEN L G, 1989, Neurology, V39, P375
  • [10] EFFECTS OF COIL DESIGN ON DELIVERY OF FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    COHEN, LG
    ROTH, BJ
    NILSSON, J
    DANG, N
    PANIZZA, M
    BANDINELLI, S
    FRIAUF, W
    HALLETT, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04): : 350 - 357