DOES ECONOMIC-GROWTH BENEFIT THE MASSES - GROWTH, DEPENDENCE, AND WELFARE IN THE THIRD-WORLD

被引:182
作者
FIREBAUGH, G
BECK, FD
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2096441
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Despite recent economic gains in much of the Third World, sociologists have paid little attention to the possible national benefits of economic growth. Instead, they have focused on the possible harm caused by the Third World's dependence on foreign investment and trade. Our analysis questions that focus. Based on data for 62 less-developed countries spanning two decades, we find that the effects of dependence largely vanish when (1) the effects of economic growth are carefully specified, and (2) the ''semi-difference'' models currently in vogue in cross-national research are replaced by more appropriate difference or difference-of-logs (growth-rare) models. In light of the common claim that economic growth in the Third World benefits only the rich, we employ measures of national welfare that the rich cannot readily monopolize. The effects of economic growth on national welfare are large and robust, whereas the effects of dependence are hard to find. These findings contradict earlier studies, which had concluded that the effects of dependence dwarf the effects of economic growth.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 653
页数:23
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
ADAMS F, 1982, COMMODITY EXPORTS EC
[2]  
AFXENTIOU PC, 1990, REV CAN ETUD DEV, V11, P241
[3]  
ALLISON PD, 1990, SOCIOL METHODOL, P93
[4]  
Amin S., 1976, UNEQUAL DEV
[5]  
Amin Samir, 1974, ACCUMULATION WORLD S
[6]  
BALLMERCAO TH, 1979, B SOCIOLOGICAL I MAR
[7]   DEPENDENCY THEORY AND TAIWAN - ANALYSIS OF A DEVIANT CASE [J].
BARRETT, RE ;
WHYTE, MK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1982, 87 (05) :1064-1089
[8]   FERTILITY CHOICE IN A MODEL OF ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
BARRO, RJ ;
BECKER, GS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1989, 57 (02) :481-501
[9]  
Belsley D. A., 1980, REGRESSION DIAGNOSTI
[10]   REGRESSION DIAGNOSTICS - AN EXPOSITORY TREATMENT OF OUTLIERS AND INFLUENTIAL CASES [J].
BOLLEN, KA ;
JACKMAN, RW .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1985, 13 (04) :510-542