HUMAN TRUNK STRENGTH PROFILE IN LATERAL FLEXION AND AXIAL ROTATION

被引:33
作者
KUMAR, S
DUFRESNE, RM
VANSCHOOR, T
机构
[1] University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
[2] Ca- nadian National Rail, Workers Compensation Board, Toronto
关键词
Functional assessment; Functional impairment; Isometric and isokinetic strength; Low back painl; Trunk side bending; Trunk twisting;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199501150-00007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. To determine the functional capability in asymmetric trunk motion, isometric and isokinetic lateral flexion and axial rotation strengths of a normal and patient samples were measured. Seventy-three normal asymptomatic subjects (41 males and 32 females) and ten patients (9 males and 1 female) were tested. Objectives. The dual objectives of the study were to develop a database for isometric and isokinetic lateral flexion and axial rotation strength capabilities of a normal sample and to determine the functional impairment of a sample of patients. Summary of Background Data. More than 60% of low back injuries are associated with trunk twisting. Asymmetric motions are important risk factors. However, strength capability data for axial rotation are sparse and those for lateral flexion nonexistent. Methods. To achieve the objectives of the study, two devices were designed and fabricated. Isometric lateral flexion was tested bilaterally bending. Isometric axial rotation was tested bilaterally in neutral posture and at 10 degrees, 20 degrees, and 30 degrees of lateral bending. Isometric axial rotation was tested bilaterally in neutral posture and at 5 degrees, 10 degrees, 15 degrees, and 20 degrees of axial rotation. Isokinetic lateral flexion and axial rotation strengths were tested bilaterally starting from the neutral posture. Results. The strength invaribly declined progressively for all groups with increasing postural asymmetry. The strength in isokinetic activities ranged between 60% to 70% of the strength measured in isometric activities. All groups were significantly stronger in lateral flexion compared with axial rotation. The female sample ranged between 60% to 70% values of males for all activities studied. The patient group was weakest, ranging between 45% to 55% for isometric and 52% to 58% for isokinetic activities if their control group.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Cartas O., Nordin M., Frankel V.H., Malgady R., Sheikhza- Deh A., Quantification of trunk muscle performance in standing, semistanding and sitting postures in healthy men, Spine, 18, pp. 603-609, (1993)
[2]  
Fraser M., Wells R., Measurement of Low-Back Strength in Torsion, pp. 179-182, (1988)
[3]  
Frymoyer J.W., Pope M.H., Costanza M.C., Et al., Epidemiologic studies of low-back pain, Spine, 5, pp. 419-423, (1980)
[4]  
Frymoyer J., Pope M.H., Clements J.H., Et al., Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey, J Bone Joint Surg, 65A, pp. 213-218, (1983)
[5]  
Gomez T., Beach G., Cooke C., Hrudey W., Goyert P., Normative data base for trunk range of motion, strength, velocity, and endurance with the isostation B-200 lumbar dynamometer, Spine, 16, pp. 15-21, (1991)
[6]  
Holbrook T., Grazier K., Kelsey J., Stauffer R., The Frequency of Occurrence Impact and Cost of Selected Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, (1984)
[7]  
Kumar S., Cummulative load as a risk factor for back pain, Spine, 15, pp. 1311-1316, (1990)
[8]  
Kumar S., Arm lift strength, Appl Ergon, pp. 317-328, (1991)
[9]  
Kumar S., Trunk Strength and Mobility Measurement for Impaired and Normal Backs: Part I-The Devices
[10]  
Part Ii-Protocol, Software Logic and Sample Results