DUPLEX DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY OF THE CAROTID-ARTERY - FALSE-POSITIVE RESULTS IN AN ARTERY CONTRALATERAL TO AN ARTERY WITH MARKED STENOSIS

被引:17
作者
BECKETT, WW [1 ]
DAVIS, PC [1 ]
HOFFMAN, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,NEURORADIOL SECT,1364 CLIFTON RD NE,ATLANTA,GA 30322
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.155.5.2120940
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Anecdotal reports have described a false-positive 'jet effect' or velocity increase in the carotid artery contralateral to an artery with significant stenosis or occlusion when using duplex Doppler sonography. In this study, the frequency, significance, and possible reasons for this finding were evaluated by a retrospective comparison of duplex sonography and angiography. Twenty-three patients with unilateral 81-100% carotid artery stenosis who underwent both duplex sonography (16 Acuson, seven Quantum) and angiography were evaluated. In 14 patients, there was an accurate or slight underestimate (<20%) of stenosis present in the internal carotid artery contralateral to an artery with tight stenosis/occlusion. In nine, a velocity increase in the internal carotid artery resulted in overestimation (10-80%) of the actual degree of stenosis. In one of these nine patients, real-time images were sufficient to explain the velocity increase on the basis of vessel tortuosity. In one, falsely elevated velocity resulted from inaccurate assignment of the Doppler angle of incidence in a patient in whom real-time visualization of a distal internal carotid lesion was poor. In four of the nine patients, cross filling via the circle of Willis toward the side of greater stenosis occurred. However, seven of 14 patients in whom there was duplex sonography/angiography agreement or slight duplex sonography underestimation also had cross filling. Vertebral artery patency did not correlate well with the presence of a 'jet effect'. These findings suggest that an increase in blood flow velocity with duplex Doppler sonography in the internal carotid artery on the side opposite an artery with a tight stenosis is a common source of error and is not readily explained by angiographic evidence of collateral flow.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1095
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
Bluth E I, 1988, Radiographics, V8, P487
[2]  
DREISBACH JN, 1983, AM J NEURORADIOL, V4, P678
[3]   THE DOPPLER SIGNAL - WHERE DOES IT COME FROM AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN [J].
NELSON, TR ;
PRETORIUS, DH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 151 (03) :439-447
[4]  
SATIANI B, 1988, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V29, P196
[5]  
WHITE DN, 1978, ULTRASOUND MED, V4, P363