OPTIMUM PLANT-POPULATION DENSITIES FOR LUPIN (LUPINUS-ANGUSTIFOLIUS L) IN THE WHEAT-BELT OF WESTERN-AUSTRALIA

被引:22
作者
FRENCH, RJ
MCCARTHY, K
SMART, WL
机构
[1] UNIV WESTERN AUSTRALIA,CRC LEGUMES MEDITERRANEAN AGR,NEDLANDS,WA 6009,AUSTRALIA
[2] WESTERN AUSTRALIA DEPT AGR,GERALDTON,WA 6530,AUSTRALIA
[3] WESTERN AUSTRALIA DEPT AGR,LAKE GRACE,WA 6353,AUSTRALIA
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE | 1994年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1071/EA9940491
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) seed yields at various plant population densities were studied in 33 separate experiments throughout the wheatbelt of Western Australia between 1987 and 1990. The experiments were designed to test the hypotheses that optimum plant population densities for lupins vary between environments and between cultivars. Another objective was the development of a framework for sowing rate recommendations from a large data set derived from sowing rate experiments. Two types of equation were fitted to each data set by nonlinear regression: one described an asymptotic response, the other a response where yield reached a maximum but declined at higher densities. The second type of equation was used to describe a data set if the residual mean square was significantly lower than for the asymptotic equation. In all, 122 individual responses were fitted, of these only 13 were not adequately described by the asymptotic model. Optimum density was chosen according to an economic criterion (when marginal revenue from an increase in plant population density equalled marginal cost). This was equivalent to choosing the point where the slope of the response curve was 0.004 t.m(2)/ha.plant (equivalent to 0.4 g/plant). Optimum density ranged from 14 to 138 plants/m(2) and was linearly related to yield potential, which we defined as either the asymptotic yield value, or the maximum yield for responses that did not approach an asymptote. Yield potential ranged from 0.13 to 4.1 t/ha. The relationship between optimum density and yield potential was the same for cvv. Danja, Gungurru, and Yorrel, and for a reduced branching breeding line (75A/329). It was also the same on soils classified as good or poor for lupins. We suggest that the relationship between optimum density and yield potential will be useful in determining target plant densities for lupins under a wide range of conditions in Western Australia, and that the techniques should prove useful in producing recommendations from density experiments in other agricultural regions.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 497
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Anderson W., 1991, WHEAT BOOK, P87
[2]   INCREASED RESPONSIVENESS OF SHORT OAT CULTIVARS TO EARLY SOWING, NITROGEN-FERTILIZER AND SEED RATE [J].
ANDERSON, WK ;
MCLEAN, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1989, 40 (04) :729-744
[3]   SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PLANT-POPULATION, YIELD COMPONENTS AND GRAIN-YIELD OF WHEAT IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT [J].
ANDERSON, WK .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1986, 37 (03) :219-233
[4]   EVIDENCE FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN 3 WHEAT CULTIVARS IN YIELD RESPONSE TO PLANT-POPULATION [J].
ANDERSON, WK ;
BARCLAY, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1991, 42 (05) :701-713
[5]   PLANT-POPULATIONS FOR TRITICALE IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT [J].
ANDERSON, WK .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1984, 8 (04) :281-295
[6]   YIELD RESPONSES OF WHEAT AND OTHER CROPS TO AGRONOMIC PRACTICES ON DUPLEX SOILS COMPARED WITH OTHER SOILS IN WESTERN-AUSTRALIA [J].
ANDERSON, WK ;
FRENCH, RJ ;
SEYMOUR, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1992, 32 (07) :963-970
[7]   EFFECT OF SOYBEAN POPULATION-DENSITY ON SOYBEAN YIELD, NITROGEN ACCUMULATION AND RESIDUAL NITROGEN [J].
BLUMENTHAL, MJ ;
QUACH, VP ;
SEARLE, PGE .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1988, 28 (01) :99-106
[8]  
EWING MA, 1982, J AGR W AUSTR, V23, P108
[9]  
FERGUSON CE, 1975, MICROECONOMIC THEORY, P222
[10]   SOIL TYPE INFLUENCES THE RELATIVE YIELDS OF DIFFERENT CEREALS AND CROP LEGUMES IN THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN WHEAT-BELT [J].
FRENCH, RJ ;
EWING, MA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1989, 29 (06) :829-835