PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING DOSE SELECTION FOR, AND EXTRAPOLATION FROM, THE CARCINOGEN BIOASSAY - DOSE INFLUENCES MECHANISM

被引:47
作者
COUNTS, JL [1 ]
GOODMAN, JI [1 ]
机构
[1] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,DEPT PHARMACOL & TOXICOL,E LANSING,MI 48824
关键词
D O I
10.1006/rtph.1995.1056
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The purpose of the bioassay is not to simply find chemicals that can be labeled as carcinogens. On the contrary, the overall goal is to provide a reasonable assessment of the possible hazard that a chemical might pose to people under realistic conditions of exposure. This paper focuses upon the doses commonly used in the bioassay within the context that dose influences mechanism and, over a wide range of doses, mechanism changes with changing dose. Thus, a carcinogenic effect observed at a high dose is not necessarily expected to occur at lower doses. A variety of examples are provided to illustrate the points that (a) any high dose, no matter how high, that permits test animals to live long enough to develop tumors is not an appropriate criterion for defining an acceptable high dose to employ in a carcinogen bioassay; and (b) emphasis should be placed upon research that may discern probable thresholds for the carcinogenic effect of chemicals, especially nongenotoxic chemicals. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 421
页数:4
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS - TOO MANY RODENT CARCINOGENS [J].
AMES, BN ;
GOLD, LS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (19) :7772-7776
[2]   DOSE-DEPENDENT RAS MUTATION SPECTRA IN N-NITROSODIETHYLAMINE INDUCED MOUSE-LIVER TUMORS AND 4-(METHYLNITROSAMINO)-1-(3-PYRIDYL)-1-BUTANONE INDUCED MOUSE LUNG-TUMORS [J].
CHEN, B ;
LIU, L ;
CASTONGUAY, A ;
MARONPOT, RR ;
ANDERSON, MW ;
YOU, M .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1993, 14 (08) :1603-1608
[3]   THYMOCYTE APOPTOSIS INDUCED BY P53-DEPENDENT AND INDEPENDENT PATHWAYS [J].
CLARKE, AR ;
PURDIE, CA ;
HARRISON, DJ ;
MORRIS, RG ;
BIRD, CC ;
HOOPER, ML ;
WYLLIE, AH .
NATURE, 1993, 362 (6423) :849-852
[4]   NEEDS FOR BIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT IN INTERSPECIES EXTRAPOLATION [J].
CLAYSON, DB .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1988, 77 :93-97
[5]   RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON HIGH-DOSE ANIMAL EXPOSURE EXPERIMENTS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
ELLWEIN, LB .
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 5 (06) :742-748
[6]   HYPOMETHYLATION OF DNA - AN EPIGENETIC MECHANISM INVOLVED IN TUMOR PROMOTION [J].
COUNTS, JL ;
GOODMAN, JI .
MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS, 1994, 11 (04) :185-188
[7]  
DEAL FH, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P6985
[8]   WHAT IS THERE THAT IS NOT POISON - A STUDY OF THE 3RD-DEFENSE BY PARACELSUS [J].
DEICHMANN, WB ;
HENSCHLER, D ;
HOLMSTEDT, B ;
KEIL, G .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1986, 58 (04) :207-213
[9]   OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVING TECHNIQUES FOR INTERSPECIES EXTRAPOLATION IN THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS [J].
GIBSON, JE ;
STARR, TB .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1988, 77 :99-105
[10]   RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY - MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE AND 2-STAGE CARCINOGENESIS MODELS [J].
GOLDSTEIN, BD .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1994, 22 (02) :194-197