MECHANISMS OF HANDLING TIME AND INTAKE RATE OF A LARGE MAMMALIAN GRAZER

被引:132
作者
LACA, EA
UNGAR, ED
DEMMENT, MW
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,DEPT AGRON & RANGE SCI,DAVIS,CA 95616
[2] AGR RES ORG,VOLCANI CTR,DEPT NAT RESOURCES,IL-50250 BET DAGAN,ISRAEL
关键词
CATTLE; CHEWING; GRAZING BEHAVIOR; INTAKE RATE; SWARD STRUCTURE;
D O I
10.1016/0168-1591(94)90011-6
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The effects of shard structure and bite weight (W) on bite rate in cattle (Bos taurus) were examined to explain the behavioural components of handling time. Three oesophageally fistulated steers grazed homogeneous, hand-constructed swards of Paspalum dilatatum Poir. or Medicago sativa L., in a sward area of approximately 0.36 m2, for 60-212 s- Three types of jaw movements (JM) were distinguished: manipulative JM that gather herbage into the mouth, chewing JM, and compound JM that manipulate fresh herbage and chew herbage already in the mouth within one cycle of opening and closing of the jaws. Intake rate (I, g min-1) was a discontinuous asymptotic function of W: I = W/max (0.0337,0.0201 + 0.0095W). Sward height and bulk density did not significantly affect I beyond the effects of W. Time per bite was 2.0 s when W almost-equal-to 1.29 g, and increased linearly with when W > 1.29 g. Linear regression of time perbite on total number of JM explained 96% of the variance. A non-linear relation between total JM per bite and W comprised a linear relation between total chews per bite and W, and a constant number of total manipulative JM per bite. When W increased up to c. 1.5 g, chewing requirements were met by compound JM, Above W of 1.5 g, the overlap of chewing and manipulation reached a maximum, so total JM increased with W. The importance of compound JM and the potential for overlap between chewing and searching are discussed in the context of foraging models.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 19
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   DETERMINANTS OF HERBAGE INTAKE BY GRAZING SHEEP - INTERRELATIONSHIP OF FACTORS INFLUENCING HERBAGE INTAKE AND AVAILABILITY [J].
ALLDEN, WG ;
WHITTAKER, IA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1970, 21 (05) :755-+
[2]  
ARNOLD GW, 1982, CSIRO8210 DIV LAND R, P1
[3]   INFLUENCE OF PROGRESSIVE DEFOLIATION OF A GRASS SWARD ON EATING BEHAVIOR OF CATTLE [J].
CHACON, E ;
STOBBS, TH .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1976, 27 (05) :709-727
[4]  
CHACON E, 1976, J BRIT GRASSLAND SOC, V31, P81
[5]   EFFECTS OF PLANT SPINESCENCE ON LARGE MAMMALIAN HERBIVORES [J].
COOPER, SM ;
OWENSMITH, N .
OECOLOGIA, 1986, 68 (03) :446-455
[6]   CHEWING ACTIVITY OF RUMINANTS AS A MEASURE OF PHYSICAL STRUCTURE - A REVIEW OF FACTORS AFFECTING IT [J].
DEBOEVER, JL ;
ANDRIES, JI ;
DEBRABANDER, DL ;
COTTYN, BG ;
BUYSSE, FX .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 27 (04) :281-291
[7]  
DEMMENT MW, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P2380
[8]   INGESTIVE BEHAVIOR OF BEEF-CATTLE OFFERED DIFFERENT FORMS OF LUCERNE (MEDICAGO-SATIVA L) [J].
DOUGHERTY, CT ;
BRADLEY, NW ;
CORNELIUS, PL ;
LAURIAULT, LM .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1989, 44 (03) :335-342
[9]   SWARD HEIGHT AND VERTICAL MORPHOLOGICAL-DIFFERENTIATION DETERMINE CATTLE BITE DIMENSIONS [J].
FLORES, ER ;
LACA, EA ;
GRIGGS, TC ;
DEMMENT, MW .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (03) :527-532
[10]  
FORBES TDA, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P2369