COMMON CLADISTIC INFORMATION AND ITS CONSENSUS REPRESENTATION - REDUCED ADAMS AND REDUCED CLADISTIC CONSENSUS TREES AND PROFILES

被引:186
作者
WILKINSON, M
机构
关键词
CLADISTICS; INFORMATION; CONSENSUS; PHYLOGENY; RANDOMIZATION; SUPPORT; BOOTSTRAPPING;
D O I
10.2307/2413673
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Consensus trees provide a means of representing cladistic information that is common to a set of fundamental trees. An analysis of the logical relations that pertain between different classes of cladistic information was undertaken. A general class of information, n-taxon statements, is recognized as a form of cladistic information in terms of which triplets (three-taxon statements), components, and subset nestings can be described. Disqualifiers (the negations of n-taxon statements) comprise an additional class of cladistic information. As is widely recognized, strict and Adams consensus methods have problems of insensitivity and ambiguity, respectively. New consensus methods were developed that solve these problems. The reduced Adams consensus method was developed to facilitate the unambiguous interpretation of Adams consensus trees. The reduced cladistic consensus method provides a solution td the problem of graphically representing all n-taxon statements that are common to a set of fundamental trees. A means of representing common disqualifiers using disqualifier-faithful subtrees is also suggested. The utility of consensus methods is discussed in the light of the development of the new methods, including the use of consensus trees in the measure of support and in support-based randomization tests.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 368
页数:26
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   CONSENSUS TECHNIQUES AND COMPARISON OF TAXONOMIC TREES [J].
ADAMS, EN .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1972, 21 (04) :390-397
[2]   N-TREES AS NESTINGS - COMPLEXITY, SIMILARITY, AND CONSENSUS [J].
ADAMS, EN .
JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 1986, 3 (02) :299-317
[3]   CONSENSUS TREES, A NECESSITY IN TAXONOMIC PRACTICE [J].
ANDERBERG, A ;
TEHLER, A .
CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 1990, 6 (04) :399-402
[4]   A RANDOMIZATION TEST FOR PHYLOGENETIC INFORMATION IN SYSTEMATIC DATA [J].
ARCHIE, JW .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1989, 38 (03) :239-252
[5]   AGAINST CONSENSUS [J].
BARRETT, M ;
DONOGHUE, MJ ;
SOBER, E .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1991, 40 (04) :486-493
[6]  
BREMER K, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P795, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x
[7]   COMBINABLE COMPONENT CONSENSUS [J].
BREMER, K .
CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 1990, 6 (04) :369-372
[8]   CHOOSING AMONG MULTIPLE EQUALLY PARSIMONIOUS CLADOGRAMS [J].
CARPENTER, JM .
CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 1988, 4 (03) :291-296
[9]  
CRACRAFT J, 1991, PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF DNA SEQUENCES, P184
[10]   THE ROLE OF COMPLEXITY IN COMPARING CLASSIFICATIONS [J].
DAY, WHE .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1983, 66 (01) :97-114